Your search for ‘RPX Corporation’ returned 509 results

The US Supreme Court has asked for the government's take on a closely watched appeal tackling the proper scope of inter partes review (IPR) estoppel, which bars (or estops) a defendant from raising certain IPR validity arguments in subsequent district court challenges.

Entropic Communications, LLC has filed separate Eastern District of Texas cases against Ubee Interactive and Vantiva, targeting the provision of cable modems and gateways, with Vantiva further targeted over television set-top boxes, that "include or are based on the Broadcom BCM3390, BCM33843, or BCM3384.

Juries returned a series of sizable damages awards in patent infringement suits this past year. However, subsequent developments in some of the cases with 2024's...

Over the past year, UK courts have issued a series of rulings requiring standard essential patent (SEP) owners to offer interim licenses in fair, reasonable...

As a result, he concluded that the patent is directed to an abstract idea.

The Court denied two of those petitions on January 18, suggesting that NHK-Fintiv is here to stay for the immediate future.

In April 2023, the USPTO issued a rulemaking proposal that detailed a potentially sweeping revamp of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings, ...

The past week ended with a series of changes that could significantly reshape the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Yesterday I highlighted a significant decision for Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) practitioners pertaining to Real-Party-In-Interest (RPI) and privity determinations, Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corporation.

The first ruling on the bond issue did not go in Longhorn IP's favor: On August 8, the court declined its request to stay the bond proceedings pending the outcome of its related motion to dismiss.

In July 2024, the UK High Court ruled against Tesla's attempt to obtain a global FRAND license determination for Avanci's 5G patent pool, citing jurisdictional limitations and insufficient legal basis.

A divided Supreme Court has issued its long-awaited decision in United States v. Arthrex, upholding the inter partes review (IPR) regime but giving the USPTO director much more power...

Back in November 2019, Bell Semiconductor, LLC (Bell Semic) began litigating the patents that the Hilco Inc. (d/b/a Hilco Global) company acquired from Broadcom, asserting nearly 20 assets from that acquisition...

Northern District of California Judge William Alsup has granted summary judgment of noninfringement for Amazon in a case from inventor-controlled MasterObjects, Inc.

The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF), a nonprofit patent management arm of the University of Wisconsin, has seen another key setback in its litigation against Apple.

Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) has released the promised draft of a bill that would revamp the law governing patent eligibility in the US under 35 USC Section 101.

The decision prompted two additional opinions, both warning that the majority had conflated its role as a gatekeeper with the jury's role as the factfinder