Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Patents In The Trump Administration: The 2-For-1 Order

    Everyone in the IP community wonders if President Donald Trump will create a new order in the IP field much the same way he has approached other areas of the government.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    PTAB Authorizes Sanctions Against Party For Failing To Update Mandatory Notices

    Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.12(a), the PTAB may impose sanctions against a party for "misconduct," including "[f]ailure to comply with an applicable rule or order in the proceeding,"...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    PTAB Issues First Post-Grant Review Final Written Decisions

    On June 13, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") issued first ever final written decisions out of post grant review proceedings.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    TTAB Nixes Toke Without Smoke

    Not often does the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board consider whether a drug is a drug. But that's what happened when the Board reviewed the mark THCTea—finding it misdescriptive.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Fee-Shifting Or Fundamental Fairness? You Decide

    On July 16, 2015 Scott Slavick's article, "Fee-shifting or fundamental fairness? You decide." was published on InsideCounsel.com.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Battling Grey Market Imports? The ITC Is Here To Help

    The grey market creates significant problems for brand owners, including lost profits, erosion of brand value, and product liability.
    United StatesInternational Law
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Additional Discovery May Be Available For Requesting Documents On A Real Party-in-Interest

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board authorized the patent owner to file a motion for additional discovery in Inter Partes Review petition brought by the petitioner, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. ("Dr. Reddy"). (Case IPR2016-01113). - See more at: http://www.brinksgilson.com/additional-discovery-may-be-available-for-requesting-documents-on-a-real-party-in-interest#sthash.2G2wrgUg.dpuf
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Secret Sales: Do You Dare?

    Prior to the implementation of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act ("AIA"), the "on sale" bar could be triggered by secret sales and offers-for-sale.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Caution Flag's Up, Racegirl!

    Did the TTAB take a wrong turn on a precedential ruling in a likelihood of confusion case last month?
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Don't Park This Truck! Dino-Dress Ruled Distinctive

    On May 4, 2015 Scott Slavick's article, "Monster truck wins reversal at TTAB, Board rebukes USPTO examiner for ruling," was published in InsideCounsel.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Model Order Limiting Excess Claims and Prior Art

    Today, the Federal Circuit Advisory Council issued a Model Order that it hopes will assist trial courts in crafting orders that reduce litigation costs and streamline patent cases.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Wham! Bam! You're Flattened, Batmen!

    On November 2, 2015 Scott Slavick's article, "Wham! Bam! You're Flattened, Batmen!" was published in InsideCounsel.com.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Judge Sandra Dee Lord Joins ITC Bench

    Judge Sandra Dee Lord has joined the United States International Trade Commission as an Administrative Law Judge, making her the third ALJ appointee to join the ITC bench in as many years.
    United StatesInternational Law
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Apple-Samsung Design Patent Damages Case

    Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Samsung's petition for a writ of certiorari in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. (No. 15-777) and will hear Apple and Samsung's arguments relating to damages awards in design patent infringement cases.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Supreme Court Appears Skeptical Of The Patentability Of Isolated DNA Molecules

    On April 15, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Association for "Molecular Pathology, et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al." regarding whether an isolated DNA molecule is patentable.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    PTAB Bar Association Debuts, Brinks Gilson & Lione Attorney Marc Richards Appointed Interim Director

    Formed as a result of the 2011 America Invents Act, the PTAB has become singularly important as a tribunal in patent cases, including inter partes proceedings with respect to patent validity.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Biosimilar Product Notice

    Apotex Inc. (Apotex) filed an application with the FDA, seeking permission to begin marketing a biosimilar version of Amgen's FDA-approved Neulasta®.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. V. My Other Bag, Inc.: Second Circuit Affirms Finding Of Trademark Parody And Copyright Fair Use

    The maker of "My Other Bag" tote bags received its hoped-for holiday gift in late December when the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's earlier grant of a summary judgment...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Supreme Court Agrees To Take On USPTO's Refusal To Register Disparaging Trademarks

    On September 29, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide a case challenging the constitutionality of a law prohibiting registration of degrading trademarks with the USPTO.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    The Ultimate Burden Of Proof Remains With Petitioner Throughout An Inter Partes Review

    The Federal Circuit reversed the final decision of an inter partes review proceeding because the Patent Trial and Appeal Board never established a prima facie basis for its obviousness determination.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione

Showing 41–60 of 271 results

PreviousNext