Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Beijing East IP Law Firm’ returned 187 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    China Courts 2013 Top 10 IP Cases

    Huawei Technology Co., Ltd has negotiated with InterDigital for many times on standard essential patent royalty or royalty rate.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The Jiangsu High Court Recognized "BURBERRY" As A Well-known Mark In A Decision Against A Squatted Mark Registered For Over 5 Years And Awarded RMB 6 Million In Damages

    Recently, the Jiangsu High Court concluded a trademark infringement and anti-unfair competition lawsuit between Burberry Limited ("Burberry")...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
Article

RMB 800,000 In Damages For Unauthorized Use Of "Mercedes In Chinese" On Auto Parts

The Shanghai IP Court recently concluded a trademark infringement lawsuit between the appellant Shanghai Tonghe Auto Parts Co., Ltd. ("Tonghe")...
ChinaIntellectual Property
Beijing East IP Law Firm
Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    A Color Combination Trademark Application Failed To Be Approved In The Second Instance Appeal

    A company applied for registration of the "" mark ("Disputed Mark") on "agricultural machinery" on November 1, 2021...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The Defendants Improperly Took Advantage Of The Market Reputation Of Liuzhou Hotel's Well-known Trademark. Considered The Infringing Hotel Was Used As A Quarantine Hotel During The Epidemic, The Defendants Were Ordered To Pay RMB 1 Million.

    On December 20, 2023, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court concluded a first-instance trademark infringement dispute between the plaintiff Liuzhou Hotel Group ("Liuzhou") and the defendants...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Filing Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Based On Marks Assigned To Outsider Constituting Bad Faith Litigation

    The Xi'an Yanta District Court recently concluded a bad faith intellectual property disputed between the Plaintiff Xi'an Beilin Guoxing Dental Clinic Co., Ltd...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The First Application Of The Principle Of Conducting Examinations Ex Officio Under Rule 72.2 Of The Implementing Regulation Of The Chinese Patent Law (2010) Philips v. Flyco (Article No. 16 From "China Patent Case Review 2015" By Beijing East IP Ltd.

    Philips v. Flyco - The First Application of the Principle of Conducting Examinations Ex Officio under Rule 72.2 of the Implementing Regulation of the Chinese Patent Law (2010).
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Unauthorized Labeling Of "Supervised By The Palace Museum" On Alcohol Products Constitutes Unfair Competition

    Recently, the Palace Museum discovered that a Sichuan liquor company and a Beijing trading company used the words "Supervised by the Palace Museum"...
    ChinaConsumer Protection
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    China 2013 Top 10 Innovative IP Cases

    Beijing EAST IP Law Firm presents a list of the most innovative IP cases of the previous year.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Decision Of The Supreme People's Court On Revising "Certain Provisions Of The Supreme People's Court On Issues Concerning The Application Of Law In The Hearing Of Patent Dispute Cases" (Draft For Soliciting Public Opinion)

    On July 16, the Supreme People’s Court published the Draft for Soliciting Public Opinion.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    A Tale Of Two Giants In China: Why Did Facebook Win And Apple Lose

    Two U.S. brands recently battled brand squatters in China with very different outcomes. Facebook won. Apple lost. Jason Wang and Amy Hsiao look behind these different results for strategic insights.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Lululemon Won RMB 1 Million In Damages

    The Meizhou Intermediate Court of Guangdong concluded a first-instance judgment on the trademark infringement dispute between Canada Lululemon Sports Goods Co., Ltd. ("Lululemon")...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Judgment Of Infringement Upon Patented Process Through Comparison Between Products Shichang XU v. Sony (China) Co. Ltd. Et Al. (Article No. 10 From "China Patent Case Review 2014" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

    A method patent is different from a product patent in that it protects a dynamic operation process.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Unauthorized Use Of "Forbidden City In Chinese" Caused Infringer RMB 330,000 In Compensation

    The Beijing Intellectual Property Court recently concluded an unfair competition dispute between the Palace Museum, Sichuan Palace Wine Co., Ltd. (Sichuan Palace Wine)...
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Allocation Of The Burden Of Proof Manfred A. A. Lupke v. Weifang Zhongyun Machine Co., Ltd. Et. Al. (Article No. 11 From "China Patent Case Review 2014" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

    Article 64 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China provides that it is the duty of a party to an action to provide evidence in support of his allegations.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Lacoste Sued Cartelo For Trademark Infringement And Won With RMB 15.05 Million In Compensation

    The Beijing High Court recently concluded a trademark infringement dispute between the appellants Xinjiang Ka E E-commerce Co., Ltd. ("Xinjiang Ka E"), Nanji E-commerce Co., Ltd...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The Beijing High Court Recognized The "Laoshan In Chinese" Mark As A Well-known Mark And Granted Cross-Class Protection

    The Beijing High Court made a second-instance judgment on the administrative trademark invalidation dispute between Qingdao Heshanquan Natural Food Co., Ltd. ("Qingdao Heshanquan")...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The Influence Of Functional Features On The Overall Visual Appearance Of A Design General Protecht Group Co., Ltd. V. Leviton Electronics (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. (Article No. 25 From "China Patent Case Review 2015" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

    The Influence of Functional Features on the Overall Visual Appearance of a Design (Administrative Judgment (2011) Xing Ti Zi No.2 by the Supreme People's Court on October 25, 2012).
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Davidoff Wins Another Administrative Trademark Enforcement Action

    Hong Kong Wanli International Limited is the registrant of the "Davidowen Daweiouwen in Chinese" mark with reg. no. 12873589 ("Disputed Mark"). ZINO DAVIDOFF SA ("Davidoff")...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Though Failed To Oppose "CANTERBURY" From Registration, Canterbury Managed To Invalidate The Squatter Mark Based On Bad Faith At Court Stage

    In July 2004, Beijing Sanwei Hezhong Business Management Co., Ltd. ("Sanwei Hezhong") applied for the registration of the...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Showing 41–60 of 187 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics