Today, the National Labor Relations Board published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on amendments to its representation election rules and procedures.

In the court's view, instead of targeting interns and directly notifying them of the litigation, the plaintiffs proposed to publicize it primarily to persons with no material connection to the lawsuit.

On June 13, 2017, Judge Robert N. Scola Jr. of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ordered Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. to make its website accessible by persons with disabilities, including those who rely on screen readers and other adaptive software.

The U.S. Department of Labor posted an announcement on its website this morning that its much anticipated proposed rule to curtail existing overtime exemptions had been approved for publication in the Federal Register...

The U.S. Department of Labor posted an announcement on its website this morning that its much anticipated proposed rule to curtail existing overtime exemptions had been approved for publication in the Federal Register as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), and would be published soon.

Pennsylvania’s Homeowner’s Emergency Mortgage Act requires a mortgagee that intends to foreclose on a residential mortgage to send a notice advising the delinquent homeowner that he has "thirty days to have a face-to-face meeting with the mortgagee who sent the notice or a consumer credit counseling agency to attempt to resolve the delinquency."

The case law on ERISA’s "presumption of prudence" continues to develop.

In 2008, hackers compromised the network of Heartland Payment Systems, a company that processes credit card transactions, and obtained access to the personal data of millions of credit card holders.

Last week, we reported on a decision out of the Southern District of New York holding that the filed rate doctrine does not apply to force-placed insurance rates because they are "secondarily billed" to the borrower.

In Riddle v. Bank of America, a judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania just granted summary judgment against the plaintiffs in a case alleging that banks and mortgage insurers participated in a "scheme" to pay purported kickbacks in violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). We have discussed other similar cases in prior posts on this blog.

Quevedo arose from a severe turbulence encounter on an international flight that allegedly seriously injured the plaintiff.

On December 1, 2014, amendments to various federal rules of practice and procedure took effect.

The forced landing killed both the pilot – Randall Hunter — and the plane's two passengers, William and Catherine Cocke.

The district court did not address the matter but the appellant argued that it was ripe for the Third Circuit's consideration because it was subject to de novo review.

Consolidation of cases in federal courts can take many forms. Sometimes cases are consolidated for all purposes.

The first employee, however, would not permit the plaintiff to change seats and instructed him to return to his original seat.

In Olympic Air, Inc. v. Helicopter Tech. Co., the District Court for the Western District of Washington struck a National Transportation Safety Board report and portions of an expert's declaration that relied on it.

Cosey v. Flight Academy of New Orleans arose out of the fatal crash of a Cessna 172 aircraft during a commercial sightseeing tour.

Courts have long held that the Federal Aviation Act ("FAAct") impliedly preempts the entire field of air safety.

The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht, a case that may foreshadow the Court's position on whether aviation manufacturers may claim FAA preemption in the face of state law claims.