Your search for ‘Irwin IP’ returned 31 results

In Exafer Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp., the Federal Circuit vacated a district court's exclusion of expert damages testimony and clarified the proper reach of its 2018 decision in Enplas Display Device Corp.

Ex parte reexaminations and inter partes review ("IPR") are two different procedures available at the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") to invalidate a patent.

Brushing aside a § 101 rejection overcome during the prosecution of U.S. Patent No. 10,946,284 (“the ’284 Patent”), District Judge Wolson granted Niantic’s motion for judgment on the pleadings finding the ’284...

If you were hoping a Sotera stipulation would bulletproof your Inter Partes Review ("IPR") petiton from a discretionary denial, the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") just poured cold water on that plan.

This presentation and its materials aim to provide general public information and entertainment pertaining to American intellectual property law.

As a result of major changes over the past year at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), it is now materially harder to institute inter partes review (IPR) and post grant review (PGR).

The Southern District of New York recently addressed whether foreign court rulings on trademark ownership should prevent parties from relitigating the same issues in U.S. courts.

The Constitution mandates that the U.S. patent system promote the progress of science and useful arts. Naming and crediting all inventors has long been central to that mandate.