Article
On Precedent Created By Chadbourne Advocacy, Court Rejects Work-Product Waiver Argument
ASPCA v. Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, 233 F.R.D. 209 (D.D.C. 2006) - this case for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Endangered Species Act, based on defendants’ allegedly unlawful handling of Asian elephants, generated a discovery dispute involving the assertion of privilege claims and the operation of Rule 26(b)(5) in the context of documents withheld by a party from production pending decision of an unresolved responsiveness objection.
Chadbourne & Parke LLP
