Your search for ‘Troutman Amin LLP’ returned 172 results

Gerald Lane, one of the nation's most prolific TCPA case filers with over 700 cases in two years, has been subject to 145 orders to show cause for failing to prosecute his cases in California's Central District. A federal judge has ordered Lane to explain his case management procedures and detail every OSC he has faced, raising questions about whether the courts have been too lenient with only one $250 sanction despite the extraordinary number of warnings.

Recent court rulings are fundamentally reshaping TCPA Do Not Call (DNC) enforcement, with some courts questioning whether DNC claims exist at all, others limiting protections to landlines only, and a growing majority concluding that SMS messages fall outside DNC restrictions. How will these divergent interpretations affect spam litigation and marketing compliance across different jurisdictions?

Sonera, the compliance and deliverability platform formed by DNC.com and Pure CallerID, has acquired Blacklist Alliance and Number Verifier in a major consolidation move. The acquisitions unite list scrubbing, litigator screening, caller identity, and number remediation on a single platform that now processes over 1.8 billion phone numbers monthly. This strategic combination positions Sonera as a dominant force in the regulated outbound engagement market, bringing together two decades of compliance data wit

Office Depot faces a summary judgment loss in a TCPA class action after advancing multiple legally flawed arguments that undermined potentially valid defenses. The court rejected arguments on DNC registration requirements, good faith defenses, and Article III standing, while the defendant's credible positions on consent and phone usage may have been overshadowed by these missteps.

What If Media Group faces a TCPA class action lawsuit over unwanted SMS messages, but the complaint reveals something intriguing: the company appears to be passing Caller ID information with text messages...

The Deserve to Win podcast unveils its brand new studio format, dubbed the "Thunderdome," promising weekly episodes covering critical TCPA, CIPA, and data privacy law updates.

The FCC has announced sweeping revisions to TCPA opt-out rules that fundamentally change how businesses must handle consumer revocation requests. These new regulations distinguish between informational and marketing messages, allow businesses to designate exclusive opt-out mechanisms, and promise to significantly reduce frivolous litigation. Will these changes apply retroactively to existing cases, and how will they reshape the landscape of telemarketing compliance?

Major law firms face mounting cybersecurity crises as data breaches expose sensitive client information including Social Security numbers and health records. The article examines whether continuing to use Big Law firms constitutes negligence given their demonstrated inability to protect confidential data.

Episode 50 of the Deserve to Win podcast features Gayla Huber, president of Integrishield and R.E.A.C.H. executive board member, discussing her groundbreaking work in consumer protection and fraud prevention. The episode also covers critical TCPA developments including new MSJ rulings on Jornaya records, DNC policy training requirements, and the dramatic decline in class action filings for July 2026.

The Deserve to Win Podcast brings together Medicare compliance expert Chris Michelson to discuss the critical 2026 Annual Enrollment Period and new CMS regulations. The episode also covers major TCPA litigation developments, including evolving interpretations of DNC rules for SMS communications and the potential return of one-to-one consent requirements.

An Ohio district court granted a motion for reconsideration six years after the Supreme Court's landmark Facebook v. Duguid decision, reversing a previous TCPA violation ruling.

A Northern District of California court remanded a CIPA privacy class action back to state court after both parties agreed the plaintiff lacked Article III standing under Popa v. Microsoft. The decision illustrates that while Popa provides defendants with a powerful standing argument in federal court, winning on jurisdictional grounds may simply return the case to state court rather than ending the litigation entirely.

A federal court enforces Groupon's venue selection clause, transferring a TCPA class action from California to Illinois where substantive law differs dramatically on whether SMS messages constitute...

California federal courts continue to classify SMS messages as telephone calls under the TCPA's Do Not Call provisions, diverging from nationwide trends. The Ninth Circuit's interpretation, inadvertently broadened by a Republican National Committee case involving MMS messages, has created binding precedent that district courts are now applying to DNC claims.

The California Privacy Protection Agency has taken enforcement action against LocateSmarter LLC, an Iowa data broker, for failing to register timely and requiring Californians...

A federal court in Iowa denied summary judgment to Medicare Health Advisors after defense counsel failed to properly authenticate Jornaya lead records and establish hearsay exceptions in a TCPA class action. The ruling highlights critical procedural mistakes in presenting consent evidence and reveals how improper handling of third-party verification records can transform a potential defense victory into millions of dollars in litigation exposure.

A major law firm's reliance on generative AI and lack of TCPA specialization led to a devastating courtroom defeat, with the judge declaring their consent arguments "backwards" and denying multiple motions in a telemarketing class action case. The case highlights the growing risks of using artificial intelligence tools for legal brief writing and the critical importance of specialized expertise in telecommunications consumer protection litigation.

Liberty Mutual's summary judgment motion in a TCPA class action was denied because the insurance company failed to demonstrate adequate training on Do Not Call list compliance procedures. While the company successfully presented evidence of its DNC policies and consent forms, the court found insufficient proof that employees and third-party vendors received proper training on these procedures, leaving the case to proceed to a jury trial.