Previously, the registrar served the notice of pre-trial conference at least 45 days before the scheduled date.

CBC argued that the lawsuit amounted to a Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation ("SLAPP") suit.

The very recent decision in Lloyd v. Bush, 2020 ONSC 842, released on February 6, 2020, demonstrates some of the frailties in our legal system.

I recently attended an interesting and informative program put together by Osgoode Hall Law School titled

In February 2024, Peter Routledge, head of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), spoke at the 2024 CatIQ Canadian Catastrophe Conference.

The other felt automated vehicles would never fully catch on as most humans enjoy driving and being in control of their own vehicle.

On appeal, the plaintiff argued that liability should have been found on the municipality.

The Supreme Court of Canada recently released its decision in Groia v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 27.

The plaintiff commenced an action pursuant to the Family Law Act arising from the death of his alleged spouse, who was killed in a motor vehicle accident.

The defendant, Aaron Lewis, pushed the plaintiff.

Prior to this decision, the LAT was divided on whether it had jurisdiction to extend the limitation period.

When compelling an applicant to attend an EUO, the insurer, among other things, must provide the applicant with notice.

A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal may cause counsel and litigants to think twice before proceeding with a summary judgment motion.

In Abyan v. Sovereign General Insurance Company (FSCO A16-003657, September 14, 2017), Arbitrator Dory found two provisions of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule to be unconstitutional ...

Barry v. Anantharajah, 2024 ONSC 740, arose out of a motor vehicle accident where the plaintiff was hit by a motor vehicle while crossing a crosswalk.

When the evidence in a personal injury action suggests that one or more of the parties may have been working when the accident occurred, insurers and defence counsel should ask themselves, is the action ripe for a Right to Sue Application?

In Chowdhury v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, 2022 ONSC 991, the plaintiff commenced a civil action in Ottawa against Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario seeking to invalidate mandatory COVID-19 vaccination laws ...

There are dangers in everyday life, but people do not need to be warned of all dangers. For instance, people do not need to be warned that jaywalking in rush hour traffic is dangerous.

In the recent decision in Wakeling v. Desjardins General Insurance Group Inc., 2021 ONCA 672, the Court of Appeal considered, among other things, whether the dissemination of information about an employee to an employer ...

After moving into a newly renovated or constructed home, the last thing people want is to have deal with the hassles and headaches of problems with their home.