Your search for ‘Patterson’ returned 1,158 results

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) went head-to-head last week with Sysco Corp. and US Foods Inc. over whether to make public the names of the declarants relied on by the FTC...

A recent Illinois ARDC recommendation for disbarment highlights the severe risks attorney misconduct poses to business clients. Discover how breach of fiduciary duty and professional negligence can impact...

As a reminder, employers sponsoring group health plans are required to notify employees of potential opportunities currently available in the State in which employees reside for group health plan premium assistance under Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program ("CHIP").

The Affordable Care Act, the federal health care reform law enacted in 2010, added a provision to the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") (Code Section 4980H) that, beginning on January 1, 2015, may subject employers to an excise tax penalty if a covered employer fails to offer health plan coverage to a sufficient number of its employees and their dependents or if it offers coverage that is deemed unaffordable or fails to provide a prescribed minimum level of benefit value.

In 2011 and 2012, we alerted you to new requirements on plan administrators of participant-directed defined contribution retirement plans (e.g., 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, profit sharing plans and money purchase plans) that are covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") to disclose certain plan and investment-related information, including fee, expense and investment performance information, to participants and beneficiaries.

Earlier this month we reminded you that plan administrators of participant-directed ERISA defined contribution retirement plans (e.g., 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, profit sharing plans and money purchase plans) had to annually disclose certain fee information to participants and beneficiaries, and that for most plans there was an upcoming deadline in August 2013 for the second round of annual notices.

On June 3, the parties in Amgen v. Sandoz presented oral arguments to the Federal Circuit as part of their dispute over the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA).

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Nos. 2023-1682, 2023-1900 (Decided March 12, 2025)...

Judge Pollak evaluated the stay motion under the three-factor test commonly employed by Courts to determine whether a stay is appropriate.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), in coordination with ICM Registry, LLC (ICM), has launched the .XXX top-level domain, which is intended for web sites related to the adult entertainment industry.

In a decision blending hip-hop mystique with intellectual-property nuance, the Eastern District of New York refused to dismiss trade secret claims over the Wu-Tang Clan's one-of-a-kind album...

Facing complex legal matters such as insurance claims, shareholder disputes, and commercial contracts requires specialized expertise to achieve favorable results. Without proper legal guidance, businesses and individuals risk costly mistakes and unfavorable outcomes that could have lasting consequences.

In United States v. Gadsden, the Second Circuit (Walker, Katzmann and Wesley, per curiam) affirmed the decision of the Southern District of New York denying Damone Gadsden's motion for...

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit conducted oral hearing en banc in EcoFactor v. Google (Appeal No. 31-1101) on March 13. The Court reconsidered the admissibility of expert testimony regarding patent damages.

On Monday, November 30, Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur approved a request by Ultra Petroleum and its affiliated debtors that he certify his October 26, 2020 ...

On December 13, the software and service provider SolarWinds announced that its Orion software platform had been the target of a sophisticated cyber-attack ...

Student data is a treasure trove for hackers.