Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Apple v. Corephotonics: PTAB Decision Focused On Expert's "Typographical Error" Rather Than The Parties' Arguments Violated Administrative Procedure Act

    On September 11, 2023, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion that vacated and remanded two final written decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Apple, Inc. v. Corephotonics, Ltd.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Federal Circuit: Claims Reciting A Term Of Degree Found Not Indefinite In One-E-Way

    On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a finding of indefiniteness that invalidated two patents claiming wireless audio systems in One-E-Way, Inc. v. ITC.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    The United States-China Trade Deal: Key Provisions for Intellectual Property Owners

    On January 15, 2020, the United States and China entered into the Economic and Trade Agreement Between The Government Of The United States Of America And The Government
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    In Re TikTok: Fifth Circuit Grants Writ Of Mandamus Intending To Improve Consistency Of Decisions From Transfer Of Venue Motions For Forum Non Conveniens

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently issued a writ of mandamus transferring a case from the Western District of Texas—a commonly chosen jurisdiction for patent infringement lawsuits...
    United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Global Developments And Considerations For Registering Cannabis And Cannabis-Related Trademarks

    Ben Natter and Jessica Sblendorio partnered with Mexican colleagues, Mauricio Chozas and Lorena Pinto, from Cuesta Campos to...
    GlobalCannabis & Hemp
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Is Legislative Reform For Inter Partes Review On The Horizon?

    Less than three years after implementation of the Inter Partes Review process, the life science industry is already calling upon Congress for significant reform.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    The Nuts And Bolts Of The Copyright Claims Board

    The Consolidated Appropriations Act which came into existence on December 27, 2020 incorporates the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act (the "CASE Act") which established the ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    But I'm An Inventor! HIP v. Hormel Foods Demonstrates That A Significant Contribution Is Required To Be A Co-Inventor On A Patent

    On May 2, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in HIP, Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corp.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Belcher Pharmaceuticals' Patent Held Unenforceable By The Federal Circuit

    The Federal Circuit published a precedential decision on September 1, 2021 regarding the unenforceability of a pharmaceutical patent due to inequitable conduct.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    CAFC's First Take On Divided Infringement For Method-Of-Treatment Claims

    On January 12, 2017, the Federal Circuit decided Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., providing its first opinion on divided infringement for pharmaceutical method patents under...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    CAFC's First Take On Divided Infringement For Method-Of-Treatment Claims

    On January 12, 2017, the Federal Circuit decided Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., providing its first opinion on divided infringement for pharmaceutical method patents...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Balancing Artificial Intelligence And Intellectual Property: Human Authorship A "Bedrock Requirement Of Copyright"

    Whether it is a smartphone, a fraud alert received from a financial institution, a vehicle modifying its settings based on current driving conditions, or political ads that will soon infiltrate our airwaves...
    United StatesTechnology
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Reverses "Inherency" Obviousness Ruling In Hatch-Waxman Lawsuit

    In a July 17, 2017, precedential opinion, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded an invalidity decision by the Delaware District Court.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Oil States Energy Services v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC: What You Should Know

    On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for a writ of certiorari in Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC. 639 Fed. App'x 639 (Fed. Cir 2016)...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Narrowly Drawn Software-Based Patent Claims Directed To Specific, Unconventional Technological Solutions Are Patent-Eligible Under Alice

    The Federal Circuit, for only the third time since the Supreme Court provided the two-step Alice framework in 2014, found software-based patent claims eligible under step two of the analysis.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Clarifies The Willful Infringement Standard And Provides Insights On Conduct That Is Exceptional In SRI v. Cisco

    The Federal Circuit in SRI Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., No. 20-1685, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Sep. 28, 2021) addressed the standards for willful infringement and enhanced damages...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Sandoz Requests U.S. Supreme Court Interpretation Of The Biologics Price Competition And Innovation Act In Amgen Inc. V. Sandoz Inc.

    As many expected, Sandoz Inc. filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking the Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit's decision in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    In Re Couvaras: Limitations Of Unexpected Results For Non-Obviousness Of Claimed Mechanisms Of Action

    On June 14, 2023, the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board upholding an Examiner's rejection of all pending claims in U.S. Patent Application 15/131,442 ('442 application).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Baxalta's Antibody Patent Held Invalid Under Amgen's Enablement Standard By The Federal Circuit

    In Baxalta, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a summary judgment finding from the District of Delaware (Judge Timothy B. Dyk) that claims 1-4, 19 and 20...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Next-Generation Antibodies: Antibody-Drug Conjugates

    Antibodies are part of the body's adaptive immune response to defend itself against toxins and pathogens, such as bacteria and viruses.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners

Showing 121–140 of 175 results

PreviousNext
Legal Intelligence Newsletters