Certain companies must report on greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption and production for each reporting year.

In the current economic climate, all businesses will be on the alert for credit issues and the possible insolvency of business partners, suppliers and major customers.

IP Australia has recently released a consultation paper entitled "Resolving Trade Mark Opposition Proceedings Faster".

Owners of well known homewares can take great comfort from the decision in Bodum v DKSH.

High Court will determine if section 92 of the Constitution prevents Racing NSW turnover levy under race fields regime.

Suppliers need to be careful in drafting retention of title ("ROT") clauses to ensure they operate as intended. When making payment, financiers ought identify the goods to which a payment relates to avoid disputes.

This decision could cast doubt on the validity of all gambling legislation that restricts interstate operators.

This case sets out clear guidelines for sales promotions, how prices should be displayed and conditions identified.

Despite the ACCC warnings, Apple proceeded with the iPad product launch as planned, so ACCC applied for an injunction.

Trade mark owners should consider brands to be lodged with the TMCH to protect from infringement and cyber squatting.

Care should be taken by those dealing with computer games to ensure compliance with the new State and Territory regimes.

The Standing Committee considered that there were not sufficient policy reasons for the Do Not Knock Register Bill.

Online gaming regulation in Australia is in a state of flux and the JSCOGR Report has not clarified the position.

The ACCC again demonstrated that the telecommunications industry is a particular target for its enforcement activities.

Direct selling organisations are responsible for any misleading representations made by their independent salesforce.

In Australia, suppliers are unable to specify a minimum price below which goods or services are unable to be resold.

The collapse of several high profile managed investment schemes including Trio Capital and Rubicon Asset Management, have resulted in a series of Court rulings on the liquidation of schemes. Whilst these cases provide useful guidance on the mechanism of winding up schemes, they also highlight the onerous responsibilities imposed on responsible entities (REs) of an insolvent scheme.

CAMAC's discussion paper is a promising sign that Australia is heading for a possible change in its regulation of CSEF.

The cases also serve as a bloggers who post or share links to unauthorised copies of copyrighted material.

Publishers should update online publications following the outcome of an investigation where the subject is cleared.