Your search for ‘ExpertsDirect’ returned 53 results

Expert evidence should be logical, consistent and well-reasoned in order to be compelling.

Experimental evidence can be expensive and time consuming, and not a just, quick and cheap resolution of proceedings.

Federal Court held that an interlocutory objection to admissibility of an expert report in its entirety, failed.

In recent case one expert's opinion was preferred over another's for a variety of reasons outlined here.

Experts must not act as an advocate and an expert in the same matter, even if there is a hiatus in between.

NSWCATAD did not accept a "report" which had been styled as expert evidence, but which had been prepared by the applicant.

Key takeaways from recent case where experts held different views.

The applicant's approach in initiating and continuing its case did not lead to the just, quick, and cheap resolution.

ACN 627 087 030 Pty Ltd as trustee for the YBL Trust (ABN 36 417 292 176) trading as Yates Beaggi Lawyers v Andrew John Price; ACN 627 087 030 Pty Ltd as trustee for the YBL Trust (ABN 36 417 292 176) trading as Yates Beaggi Lawyers v Elisabeth Theodore[2024] NSWDC 121

Examples of acts by an expert witness that would constitute advocating for one of the parties.

Expert valuers must ensure that their valuations follow the instructions provided by the parties and the contract terms.

An expert who had previously written reports & presented evidence in various courts was still found to have "doubtful qualifications".

Court ruled that the restriction upon multiple experts should yield to the plaintiff's concern to explore the comparison between the clinical indications for thrombolysis and clot retrieval.

An expert's current or past employment relationship with one of the parties does not, on its own, mean their evidence is automatically biased or will be inadmissible.

Reopening a case may prejudice the other party or new evidence may impact the result.

Experts should ensure that the scope of their instructions is clear from the outset.

Discusses recent case where the appellants disputed the amount offered by Valuer General for their compulsorily acquired land.