Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Lizzie Borden House Has Its Infringement Claim Chopped Down

    This article is about a 2024 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arising out of the "trial of the century" in 1892...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Proving A Slogan Fails To Function As A Trademark

    To be registrable, a trademark must identify and distinguish an applicant's goods from those of others and indicate the source of those goods. When an Examining Attorney or an opposer challenges...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Services Have Boundaries In Trademark Proceedings

    In order to succeed in challenging the registration of a service mark on the ground that it is likely to cause confusion with your identical or similar mark...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Take Care When A Subsidiary Owns A Trademark Used Only By Its Parent Company

    If a mark is in active use only by your operating company, but a registration of the mark is owned by its subsidiary, special steps may be necessary to register that mark...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Trademark Law Alert -- Settlement Agreement Concerning One Mark Supports Registration Of A Substitute Mark

    The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board found no likelihood of confusion between PRIM and HOUSE OF PRIM marks for home organization services, giving substantial weight to a settlement agreement where parties agreed the marks were not confusingly similar.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    How Brands Can Identify And Mitigate AI-Related Risks In Advertising Campaigns

    Brand owners rely on their advertising and media buying agencies for content creation, brand analysis, and marketing strategy.
    United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Adding A Word Or Distinctive Design To A Mark Sometimes Can Avoid A Likelihood Of Confusion

    Many times, two marks have been found likely to be confused despite (1) the addition of a second word to the later mark (found not to overcome that mark's use of the identical or similar word...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    How To Preserve U.S. Rights In A Registered Trademark That Is Not In Use

    Garan Services Corp.'s application to register mark NEWMAN, in the identical mirror image form of display, for "tops and bottoms" was blocked by the Belle Etoille registrations.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Merely Descriptive Or Generic Marks

    The distinction between descriptive and generic trademarks can determine whether a mark qualifies for federal registration. When Access Medical Laboratories sought to register FOODANALYZER for food sensitivity testing services, the USPTO initially deemed it merely descriptive, then generic—sparking a legal battle that would clarify the boundaries between these critical trademark classifications.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Non-U.S. Trademark Registrants Beware!

    When a non-U.S. company obtains a U.S. trademark registration based on a foreign registration without U.S. use, failing to file the required Declaration of Use within six years can result in cancellation with serious consequences. A recent TTAB decision demonstrates how a lapsed registration loses all protective value, even against later-filed confusingly similar marks that were registered while the original registration was still active.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    The Ninth Circuit Affirms Non-Infringement Verdict Concerning Tattoo Artist's Use Of Miles Davis Photo, But Two Concurring Opinions Invite En Banc Review

    In a per curiam decision issued on January 2, 2026, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg, No. 24-3367 (9th Cir. January 2, 2026) affirmed the jury's verdict for celebrity tattoo artist...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Trademark Law Alert -- Proposed Federal Act Would Protect Individuals Against AI-Generated Fakes

    The proposed NO FAKES Act of 2026 seeks to establish federal protection for individuals' digital identities against AI-generated deepfakes by creating a property right in one's voice and visual likeness. This bipartisan legislation would protect all individuals, living or deceased, from unauthorized digital replicas while balancing First Amendment protections and technological innovation. The bill introduces liability frameworks, safe harbors for platforms, and enforcement mechanisms that could fundamentall
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Trademark Law Alert -- Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds Corporate Separateness In Trademark Damages Case

    When can a trademark plaintiff recover profits from an infringer's affiliates? The U.S. Supreme Court tackled this question in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc., No. 23-900...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Two Points To Consider When Adopting A New Brand

    Two recent cases illustrate points to consider when selecting a new beauty, apparel or lifestyle brand. The first concerns the risk of reverse confusion. The second concerns geographic descriptiveness.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Understanding “Primarily Merely A Surname” U.S. Trademark Registration Refusals

    The U.S. Trademark Act prohibits registration of marks that are "primarily merely a surname," but determining whether a mark qualifies as such involves analyzing multiple factors including public perception...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    U.S. Requirements For Establishing Use Of A Trademark In Commerce

    Merely offering your goods under a trademark on a website or in a store is insufficient to support an allegation that you have used your trademark in U.S. commerce for a trademark application.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Trade Dress Infringement Claim And Related Discovery Triggered Insurer's Duty To Defend

    The Second Circuit has held that a commercial general liability policy that covered "advertising injury" required an insurer to defend its insured against claims for trade dress infringement.
    United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Patent Law Alert -- Proposed Changes To USPTO's Inter Partes Review Process – Does It Start A New "Race To Judgment" On Patent Invalidity?

    On October 17, 2025, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a Public Notice proposing significant changes to the rules...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    Trademark Law Alert--Cross-Border Trademark Priority

    The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), in a precedential decision of first impression, decided that a British Virgin Islands (BVI) company, applying in the U.S. to register CANDYVERSE for soft drinks...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
  • Article

    The Brand Trophy Paradox: How To Market Brand Recognition And Avoid Legal Risk

    Brands are delighted to receive an award or a seal of approval. Marketing those trophies requires careful consideration of intellectual property and advertising law principles.
    United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
    Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

Showing 161–180 of 261 results

PreviousNext