On 18 March 2013, the Commission published revised guidance on the conduct of on-the-spot inspections at the business premises of companies suspected of having engaged in anti-competitive behaviour.

The ECJ noted that the pre-pricing communications were among competitors who discussed their own quotation prices and certain market price trends.

In this case, T-Mobile was a direct competitor of Hutchison and Orange.

The Italian NCA granted Deutsche Bahn AG full immunity from fines, whereas DHL was only granted a 50% reduction.

The ECJ handed its judgment in Kone AG and Others V ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG, finding that participants in a cartel may be held liable for damage caused outside the cartel.

In 2008, the European Commission found that Total SA and Total Marketing Services had participated, along with other undertakings, in a cartel on the EEA paraffin wax market...

On 19 April 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered a judgment holding that investigations of price discrimination under EU competition law should involve an examination...

On 13 December 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down a preliminary ruling on a reference from the French Supreme Court on whether national competition authorities can take enforcement actions against companies found to be in breach of Article 101 TFEU.

In two recent orders, the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") has reaffirmed the principles governing the liability of parent companies for the conduct of their wholly-owned subsidiaries, as established in Akzo Nobel.

On 3 August 2015, the European Commission adopted amendments to Regulation 773/2004 on the conduct of proceedings pursuant to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.

On 28 January 2015, in two separate decisions, the European Commission conditionally approved a complex transaction between pharmaceuticals producers GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Novartis.

On 26 July 2016, the Commission made legally binding the commitments offered by Paramount Pictures as it considered that they adequately addressed its concerns regarding specific contractual clauses restricting passive sales.

On 16 March 2012, the European Commission published new informal guidance on how confidentiality claims should be made by undertakings in respect of documents and submissions provided to DG Competition in the context of investigations into alleged breaches of Article 101 and Article 102 TFEU.

Asics had not appealed the finding of the Higher Regional Court that the prohibition against using price comparison sites fell under Article 101(1) TFEU.

The European Data Protection Supervisor recently called for closer interaction in the fields of competition enforcement, consumer protection and privacy.

In addition, the guidance outlines the manner in which non-confidential versions of documents must be submitted.

The amendments to the Austrian Cartel Act introduce an additional notification threshold, which is based on value of a transaction.

The ECJ was asked to rule on preliminary questions submitted by the Lithuanian Supreme Court in the context of a dispute between Ms `iba and her former lawyer, Mr Devėnas.

On 12 July 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "ECJ") handed down a judgment regarding the interpretation of Articles 49 and 54 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") in proceedings concerning a cross-border conversion of a company governed by Italian law into a company governed by Hungarian law (ECJ, case C-378/10, VALE Építési kft).

The Proposal contains rules on the: (i) conformity of the goods; (ii) remedies in the event of lack of conformity; and (iii) practical terms of the exercise of such remedies.