On 26 November 2015, the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") handed down its judgment in a request for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Maxima Latvija and the Latvian Competition Council.

On 9 September 2015, the General Court ("GC") largely upheld the Commission's decision in the TV and computer monitor tubes cartel on both the substantive issues and the general principles followed to set the level of the fines.

On 29 June 2017, the DCA published the non-confidential version of a decision of 22 May 2017 imposing a €40.95 million fine on Dutch rail operator Nederlandse Spoorwegen for abusing its dominant position ...

On 6 April 2016, the European Commission announced that it had reduced the fine imposed on French bank Société Générale from €446 million to €227.7 million after having revised the value of sales used to calculate the fine.

These proposals are significant and seek to more closely scrutinise foreign investment deals that affect national security.

On 4 June 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "ECJ") ruled on a request for a preliminary ruling from the German Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) regarding the misleading labelling of foodstuffs...

The judgment is of particular importance since it appears to represent a reversal in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence.

Contrary to Portuguese law, the application of Luxembourg law would not have resulted in the termination of the pending lawsuits.

Bacardi had not consented to the marketing of the goods at issue in the EEA and claimed infringement of its Benelux trade marks.

On 12 December 2018, the EU General Court dismissed the application for annulment which Canal + SA had brought against a European Commission decision that had made commitments offered by Paramount Pictures Ltd ...

Hence, the ECJ found that the German law infringed both the InfoSoc Directive and the Enforcement Directive.

On 10 June 2015, the Council of the EU's Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) approved a compromise agreement on the proposed trade mark reform package...

The Commission had already accepted and made binding commitments offered by Paramount Pictures in July 2016.

The second question was whether a provision of national law can limit the application of Article 7(f) of the Data Protection Directive.

The issue was eventually brought before the German Federal Administrative Court which referred a number of questions to the ECJ.

On 19 November 2015, the Regional Court of Düsseldorf (the "Court") rejected a car insurer's claim for damages resulting from the European Commission's decision in the car glass cartel case.

In the present case, the patents were neither standard essential nor non-avoidable.

On 21 August 2025, the European Union and the United States published a Joint Statement (JS) "on a United States-European framework on an agreement on reciprocal...

In certain respects, however, transposition was not deemed necessary.

Of immediate relevance for third countries is the APF's assault against "foreign governments' free-riding off American investment in innovation".