Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,424 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Precedential No. 14: On Remand From CAFC, TTAB Considers 8th DuPont Factor, Affirms Section 2(d) Refusal Of GUILD MORTGAGE COMPANY

    On remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Board again affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark GUILD MORTGAGE COMPANY & Design
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 18: Finding Abandonment Of Opposer's Mark, TTAB Dismisses ARMBRUSTER STAGEWAY Opposition

    In an exhaustive 61-page opinion, the TTAB dismissed this Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark ARMBRUSTER STAGEWAY for "vehicles, namely, customized limousines," ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 2: #MAGICNUMBER108 Fails To Function As A Trademark For Shirts, Says TTAB

    Finding that the term #MAGICNUMBER108 fails to function as a trademark for shirts, the TTAB affirmed a refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Lanham Act.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 20: TTAB Declines To Strike Summary Judgment Motion As Untimely After Respondent Consented To Extension

    [This guest post was written by Kira-Khanh McCarthy, a rising-3L at University of Notre Dame Law School.] In this cancellation proceeding involving a registration for the mark SOFT COAG
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 23: FUCK Fails To Function As A Source Indicator For Jewelry, Bags, And Retail Services, Says TTAB

    Erik Brunetti, famous in the trademark world for knocking the scandalous and immoral provision of Section 2(a) out of the Lanham Act [TTABlogged here], returned...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 28: TTAB Test - Is I'M SMOKING HOT Confusable With SMOKIN' HOT SHOW TIME For Cosmetics?

    The USPTO refused registration of I'M SMOKING HOT for cosmetics, makeup, and other personal care products
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 30: Rejecting Opposer's Over-Counting Of Interrogatories, TTAB Grants Motion To Compel Responses

    In a less than scintillating ruling, the Board order consolidation of two oppositions involving the same marks and parties ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 33: TTAB Denies Reconsideration Of Untimely Motion To Compel Filed On Deadline Day For Pre-Trial Disclosures

    In yet another precedential decision dealing with the January 2017 rule changes, the Board rejected Opposer Asustek's motion for reconsideration of an order denying its motion to compel discovery responses as untimely:
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 38: Floyd Mayweather T.k.o.'d: TTAB Affirms Failure-to-Function Refusal Of PAST PRESENT FUTURE For T-shirts

    Undefeated boxing champion Floyd Mayweather, Jr., suffered a TTAB t.k.o. (trademark knock-out) in his bout to register the phrase PAST PRESENT FUTURE for "T-shirts."...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 5: TTAB Finds VIRTUAL INDEPENDENT PARALEGALS Generic For ..... Guess What?

    In a less than scintillating but precedential ruling, the Board affirmed two refusals to register VIRTUAL INDEPENDENT PARALEGALS for "paralegal services; providing medical record summaries,
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 7: TTAB Denies Motion To Strike Disclosure Notice And Preclude Expert Testimony

    In this consolidated cancellation proceeding involving registrations for the marks MONSTER SEAL A FLAT, MONSTER UP, and UNLEASH THE BEAST for "tire sealing compound ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Professor McCarthy Criticizes CAFC's Stance On Article III Standing In Brooklyn Brewery Case

    Professor J. Thomas McCarthy has provided to me his comments on the CAFC's October 27, 2021 decision in the Brooklyn Brewery case, in which the appellate court largely affirmed the TTAB's denial...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Reversing TTAB, E.D. Va. Finds VAGISAN Confusable With Famous VAGISIL Mark For Feminine Hygiene Products

    Reversing the TTAB's June 19, 2017 decision, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia found the mark VAGISAN for various feminine hygiene products likely to cause confusion with the registered mark...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    SDNY Correctly Applies B&B Hardware In Rejecting Plaintiff Lexington Furniture's TTAB-based Issue Preclusion Argument

    The U.S District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Plaintiff LFI's motion for summary judgment in this action for trademark infringement involving Defendant's use of the mark LEXINGTON for home textiles.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    "STILL SPOONING" Fails To Function As A Mark For Custom Imprinting And Retail Services, Says TTAB

    The Board sustained these consolidated oppositions to registration of STILL SPOONING for "Custom imprinting of flatware and fishing lures"...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Affirms Failure-To-Function Refusal Of Graphic Tool Used By DJ's For Harmonic Compatability

    The Board affirmed a refusal to register the design mark shown below, finding that the design is a graphic tool used by DJs to discern harmonic compatability, and does not function as a trademark
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Affirms Geographical Descriptiveness Refusal Of RENOAIR For Air Transport Services: Distinctiveness For Model Airplanes Not Transferable

    American Airlines applied to register the mark RENOAIR for "air transport of passengers, cargo and freight" under Section 2(f) of the Lanham Act.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Affirms Two More Failure-To-Function Refusals

    In failure-to-function cases, the key question is how the alleged mark will be perceived by relevant consumers.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Affirms Two Refusals Of BOCCA DOLCE For Chocolate Confections: Disclaimer Requirement And Likelihood Of Confusion

    The Board affirmed a bifusal of the mark BOCCA DOLCE for "chocolate confections," upholding the USPTO's requirement of a disclaimer of DOLCE and finding a likelihood of confusion...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Denies Fraud Claim But Grants Petition To Cancel SEYIDOGLU Registration On Section 2(a) False Connection Ground

    In a case decided under the TTAB's ACR regime, the Board granted a petition for cancellation of Nema Foods' twenty-year old registration for the mark SEYIDOGLU (in standard form)
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Showing 801–820 of 1424 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics