1,424 results found

Finding that Petitioner Optimal Chemical had perpetrated a fraud on the Board through fabricated evidence and untruthful testimony,...

Alyssa Carson and Abigail Harrison both desire to be the first human being to set foot on Mars, which led to their clash over the term "Mars Generation."

The Board upheld a Section 2(a) deceptiveness refusal of the proposed mark SMART SUTURE for "bandages for surgical use for skin wounds having mechanical hooks that ...

he Board dismissed Applicant NfoSnap's counterclaim alleging that the mark SNAPCHAT is generic for "computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers, namely...

The Board granted Opposer Kastle's motion for summary judgment, dismissing Applicant Lee's counterclaim alleging fraud in the procurement of one of Kastle's pleaded registrations.

The USPTO refused registration of the mark shown below left, finding it likely to cause confusion with the mark shown below right, both for cigars. On appeal, applicant argued that the customers for its "high-end" cigars are sophisticated and selective, and furthermore that four third-party registrations for marks containing the letter "P" demonstrate that the cited mark is weak.

This is a family blog, but perhaps your children shouldn't read this one.

The USPTO refused registration of the mark GEL-SHOTZ in the stylized form immediately below, for "flavored and sweetened gelatins,"

The USPTO refused to register the mark GLOBAL OSHA GLOBAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACADEMY, LLC and Design (shown immediately below) [GLOBAL OSHA and GLOBAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACADEMY disclaimed] for "consulting in the field of workplace safety,"

The TTAB (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(d) refusals described below. No hints today. How do you think they turned out?

Since registrant's "alcoholic beverages" encompass "whiskey," the involved goods are in part legally identical.

Among the flurry of opinions issued by the Board on September 30th, the last day of the USPTO's fiscal year, were the three listed below, ...

So far this year, the TTAB has affirmed 172 of the 184 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (about 93.5%). Here are three decisions that came down recently. How do you think they came out? [Results in first comment].

I think I've been making these TTABlog Tests too easy. I'm not giving any hints on this one. Here are three recent decisions in appeals from Section 2(d) refusals.

I've been making these TTABlog Tests too easy lately. This time I'm not giving any hints. Here are three recent decisions in appeals from Section 2(d) refusals. How do you think these came out? [Answers in first comment].

The United States District Court for the District of Oregon reversed the Board's decision dismissing an opposition to registration of the mark MANIMAL for ...

The Board dismissed this opposition to registration of the mark BLUE IVY CARTER for a variety of goods and services in 14 classes

The Board affirmed a refusal to register BORN IN THE USA for "bottoms as clothing; footwear; headwear; tops as clothing," finding that the phrase fails to function as a trademark.