Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2020

TTAB Dismisses Counterclaim On Summary Judgment For Failure To Prove SNAPCHAT Is Generic

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

he Board dismissed Applicant NfoSnap's counterclaim alleging that the mark SNAPCHAT is generic for "computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers, namely...

United StatesIntellectual Property
The Board dismissed Applicant NfoSnap's counterclaim alleging that the mark SNAPCHAT is generic for "computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers, namely, software for sending digital photos, videos, images, and text to others via the global computer network," due to failure of proof. NfoSnap submitted evidence regarding the genericness of "snap" and "chat" as separate terms, but failed to raise "a genuine dispute as to the genericness of the combination SNAPCHAT in the face of NfoSnap's own evidence to the contrary." Snap Inc. v. NfoSnap, Inc.., Opposition No. 91238805 (April 23, 2020) [not precedential].

939902.jpg
NfoSnap applied to register the mark NFOSNAP for "computer software to allow controlled access for one or multiple users to scan an optical code with a portable computer or imaging device to access custom and interactive content." Snap, Inc. opposed, claiming likelihood of confusion with, and likelihood of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from