1,424 results found

The Board sustained this opposition to registration of FOUNDATIONAL MEDICINE REVIEW for "journals in the field of medicine" and "providing on-line non-downloadable articles...

In a long-running battle over the mark IPAD. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the entry of summary judgment by the U.S. District Court...

Despite Applicant Louis Vuitton's attempt to sidestep the refusal by narrowing its identified channels of trade, the Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark APOGÉE...

Well, I'll be holed-up in Eastham, Massachusetts again this week. It's not easy to stay inside on Cape Cod during the summer...

[This blog post is a collaborative effort of yours truly and members of the IP CO-LAB Clinic at Northeastern University].

The Board denied the Rule 12(b)(6) motion of Applicant, United Trademark Holdings, Inc., to dismiss this opposition to registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls ...

The Board dismissed this Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark MANSUR GAVRIEL, in standard character form ...

Playboy Enterprises failed to pull a rabbit out of its hat in this appeal from a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below, for various entertainment services including video game-related services.

In what may be one of the biggest wastes of time in the history of trademark jurisprudence, the Board reversed the USPTO's requirements that LEGO disclaim the word KID, ...

The Board has re-designated as precedential its March 22, 2022 decision denying Opposer Conopco's motion to re-open its discovery and trial periods.

Observing that there are no precedential decisions regarding an examining attorney's failure to properly submit Internet evidence, the Board ruled that both applicants ...

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey issued a Final Judgment ordering the Commissioner of the USPTO to "transfer" to Piano Wellness LLC ...

Finding that the proposed mark PURPLE RAIN for dietary and nutritional supplements falsely suggests a connection with the famous musician and performer Prince, ...

In a case of first impression, the TTAB ruled that a licensee cannot establish priority based on use of the subject mark by her licensor.

This rather mundane Section 2(d) appeal was apparently deemed precedential because of the applicant's attempt...

In a less than scintillating ruling, the Board order consolidation of two oppositions involving the same marks and parties and common issues of law and fact.

You might say the Applicant Fancy Pants relied on the old rope-a-dope strategy in this opposition to its application to register SMOKES & Design for "Cigarettes...

The USPTO refused to register the mark shown below, for "vodka," based on the applicant's failure to comply with a drawing requirement and its failure to amend the color claim in the application.