1,424 results found

In seeking cancellation of a registration for the mark KIMBERLEY KAMPERS for campers, Petitioner moved for summary judgment on the grounds of non-ownership and abandonment...

Tom & Martha LLC's application to register the mark LOCH MOOSE MONSTER for gift shop goods and services survived a feeble summary judgment attack by frequent TTAB plaintiff Monster Energy...

Fellow Bostonian Keith Toms has called to my attention a precedential TTAB interlocutory order issued on December 28, 2017.

The Board affirmed a refusal to register the phrase RIBBONS OF HOPE as a trademark for pasta, finding that the phrase fails to function as a mark.

The Board granted Opposer Tidal Music's motion for summary judgment, concluding that Applicant Rose Digital had failed to prove use of the applied-for mark #TIDALTUESDAY for advertising...

The USPTO refused registration of the mark ATHLETE INTELLIGENCE, in standard character form, for wearable monitoring devices and systems.

Swan Song, Inc. opposed an application to register the mark SWAN SONG AUDIO for ""Consumer electronic products, namely, audio amplifiers

A TTAB judge once told me that you can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time by just looking at the goods/services and the marks.

The USPTO refused to register, on the Supplemental Register, the term D'AVOCADO for "high pressure pasteurized avocado based chocolate confections, mousses...

Therabody, Inc. opposed an application to register the mark THREEGUN (in slightly stylized form) for various medical devices and products, including massage apparatus...

A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.

The TTAB recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals summarized below. At least one of the three refusals was reversed.

The Board recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(d) refusals described below. One of the refusals was reversed. How do you think these came out? [Answer in first comment].

The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. No hints this time. Let's see how you do with them. Answer will be found in the first comment.

Here are the first three TTAB decisions of the new year in appeals from Section 2(d) refusals. No hints today. How do you think they turned out? [Answer in first comment].

The Board's shutout streak in Section 2(d) appeals is up to 33 affirmances and no reversals. Here are the latest three decisions. Has the streak been broken? How do you think they turned out?...

The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. Let's see how you do with them. Answer will be found in the first comment.

The Board has affirmed 67 of the first 70 Section 2(d) refusals it has considered on appeal this year. Here are the latest three appeals for your consideration. [Results in first comment].