Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 NOVEMBER 2022

Precedential No. 32: In An "Unusual Situation," TTAB Opts To Consider Summary Judgment Motion On Unpleaded Claim

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

In seeking cancellation of a registration for the mark KIMBERLEY KAMPERS for campers, Petitioner moved for summary judgment on the grounds of non-ownership and abandonment...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In seeking cancellation of a registration for the mark KIMBERLEY KAMPERS for campers, Petitioner moved for summary judgment on the grounds of non-ownership and abandonment, but it failed to meet its initial burden to make a prima facie case. The Board therefore denied the motion as to those grounds, but in light of Petitioner's evidence regarding nonuse during the three-year statutory abandonment period, the Board chose to consider nonuse (though unpleaded) as a separate ground for summary judgment, and it set a schedule for briefing that issue. Kimberley Kampers IP Pty Ltd v. Safiery Pty Ltd, 2022 USPQ2d 1036 (TTAB 2022) [precedential].

1248674a.jpg

Petitioner claimed that it could meet its initial burden to prove a prima facie case "by showing that there is an absence of evidence supporting the nonmoving party's case." Wrong, said the Board. "[W]here, as here, 'the moving party will bear the burden of persuasion at trial, that party must support its motion with credible

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from