Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,415 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    District Court: Instituted IPR Defeats Motion For Preliminary Injunction

    On remand from the Federal Circuit, the district court in Murata Machinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuku Co., Ltd., reaffirmed its earlier decision to deny Murata's motion for a preliminary injunction.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Don't You Forget About Me: Petitioner's Failure To Specifically Demonstrate Material Error Leads To Denial Under § 325(d)

    Under the new bifurcated discretionary denial review process, 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) has most often been cited in support of referral due to the need to correct material...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Error 101: IP Associations Propose Legislation For Patentable Subject Matter

    Three prominent IP groups propose amending § 101 to clarify what is patentable subject matter. The American Bar Association (ABA) IP Section, and the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Estoppel May Apply After Pre-Institution Disclaimer Of Challenged Claims In An IPR Proceeding

    During the early stages of an IPR proceeding initiated by Smith & Nephew, patent owner Arthrex disclaimed all patent claims challenged in the petition.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Expansion Of The Madrid System

    As of 4 March 2019, Samoa become a member of the Madrid Protocol. Canada's membership quickly followed suit and its accession to the Madrid Protocol will come into effect on 17 June 2019.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Factual Issues Underlying § 101 Analysis Can Preclude Dismissal Under Rule 12(B)(6)

    In Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc., No. 2017-1452 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2018), the Federal Circuit reversed-in-part and vacated-in-part ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Failure To Object To Jury Instructions Kills Invalidity Counterclaim

    In Flexuspine, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's decision denying motions to amend the judgment to include an invalidity determination.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Fast‑Forward To Ineligibility: Federal Circuit Invalidates Web‑Conferencing Patent Under § 101

    In US Pat. No. 7,679,637 LLC v. Google LLC, No. 2024-1520, 2026 WL 174922 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 22, 2026)...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    FDA Request For Justification Found To Provide A Mere Research Suggestion—Not Conception Of Claimed Formulation

    In Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mylan Institutional LLC, Nos. 16-1115, -1259 , the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court's holding that a patent covering a chelating-agent-free drug formulation...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Affirms Application Of The Foreign Equivalents Doctrine And Refusal Of "VETEMENTS" Trademark

    In In re Vetements Group AG, Nos. 2023-2050, 2023-2051 (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2025), the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB's refusal to register "VETEMENTS" for clothing and online retail services...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Affirms Principle Of Party Presentation Allows The Parties, Not The Court, To Chart The Course Of A Litigation

    In Astellas Pharma, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 23-2032 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2024), the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the case.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB's Decision Of No Anticipation In Microsoft V. Biscotti

    In Microsoft Corporation v. Biscotti, Inc., Nos. 2016-2080, 2016-2082, 2016-2083 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 28, 2017)...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB In First Ever Review Of AIA Derivation Proceeding

    In Global Health Solutions LLC v. Selner, No. 2023-2009 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2025), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's rejection of Global Health's AIA...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Affirms Rejection Of Character Mark Citing Prior Use And Likelihood Of Confusion

    In Araujo v. Framboise Holdings Inc., 99 F.4th 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2024), the Federal Circuit affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's ("TTAB") decision sustaining Framboise's...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Affirms Specific Intent To Deceive Based On Discovery Misconduct

    In Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Merus N.V., No. 2016-1346 (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's decision that the claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,502,018 were unenforceable...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Affirms TTAB Decision Finding Likelihood Of Confusion Between SPARK LIVING And SPARK Marks

    In re Charger Ventures LLC, No. 2022-1094 (Fed. Cir. April 13, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB's decision denying registration of Charger's trademark SPARK LIVING due to the likelihood of confusion with the earlier registered SPARK trademark.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Clarifies Conception Standard For Inventorship, Vacates-in-part PTAB Judgment

    In Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Broad Inst., Inc., No. 2022-1594 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2025), the Federal Circuit vacated in part a determination by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in a patent...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Compels Transfer Of Ownership Of Japanese Patent Applications

    In SiOnyx LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Nos. 2019-2359, 2020-1217 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2020), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's denial ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Confirms Joint Inventorship On Nobel Prize Winner's Cancer Treatment Paten

    In Dana-Farber Cancer Institute v. Ono Pharmaceutical Co., No. 19-2050 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2020), the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court judgment ordering two scientists...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Confirms Joint Inventorship On Nobel Prize Winner's Cancer Treatment Patents

    In Dana-Farber Cancer Institute v. Ono Pharmaceutical Co., No. 19-2050 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2020), the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court judgment ordering two scientists...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 821–840 of 4415 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics