Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2017

FDA Request For Justification Found To Provide A Mere Research Suggestion—Not Conception Of Claimed Formulation

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

In Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mylan Institutional LLC, Nos. 16-1115, -1259 , the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court's holding that a patent covering a chelating-agent-free drug formulation...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mylan Institutional LLC, Nos. 16-1115, -1259 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 26, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court's holding that a patent covering a chelating-agent-free drug formulation was not derived from someone at the FDA.

Mylan's derivation argument centered around communications between the inventor and the FDA regarding Cumberland's application to market a pharmaceutical formulation that included the chelating agent EDTA. Specifically, the FDA requested that Cumberland provide justification for including EDTA in the formulation. Mylan argued that the FDA request (along with other exchanges) established conception of the claimed chelating-agent-free formulation by the FDA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from