Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,412 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Combating Patent Litigation: The Dark Cloud Over Cloud Computing

    The growing cloud computing industry brings many new opportunities, but with success comes litigation, both from competitors seeking to gain an edge in a crowded market and opportunists...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Coming Into Focus: Federal Circuit Affirms TTAB Decision Finding Likelihood Of Confusion Between FOCUSVISION And FOCUS Marks

    In Focusvision Worldwide, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc., No. 20-2054 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2021), the Federal Circuit affirmed a TTAB decision sustaining the opposition...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Connecting The Threads: Tips For Obtaining Strong Patent Protection In Textiles

    The textile industry has grown significantly over the last few years. With growth comes the need to develop new products, create more efficient manufacturing processes,and craft new technologies.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Continuation In-Part Imparts Standing In Patent Assignment Appeal

    In Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, No. 2023-1769 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2025), the Federal Circuit determined that Causam had standing to assert its assigned patent.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Copyright Office Announces New Fee Schedule

    The U.S. Copyright Act announced that a new fee schedule will take effect May 1, 2014.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Copyright Office To Hold Public Meetings Regarding Orphan Works

    On March 10 and 11, 2014, the Copyright Office will host public discussions regarding potential legislation related to orphan works and mass digitization of books.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Court Rejects Pre-Litigation Acts To Manipulate Venue

    In In re Samsung Elecs Co., No. 2021-139 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2021),the Federal Circuit granted mandamus, ordering the transfer of pending cases by Ikorongo Tech and Ikorongo Texas against...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Court To Decide Key Question On Patentability Of 3D Digital Models

    This summer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will decide how patent law should treat digital representations of physical objects, also called "3D digital models".
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Court Upholds No Same-Party Or New Issue Joinder For IPRs At The PTAB

    In Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC, No. 2018-1400 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2020), the Federal Circuit denied Appellant's petition for rehearing en banc but granted their petition ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Court Upholds Patent Eligibility Of "Method Of Preparation" Claims In Modified Opinion

    In Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., No. 2019-1419 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 3, 2020), the Federal Circuit denied Appellees' petition for a rehearing en banc, but granted their petition for panel rehearing in order to withdraw ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Cross-Appeal Deadline Rule Is Not Jurisdictional

    The Federal Circuit clarified issues of PTAB and appellate procedure in In re IPR Licensing, Inc., No. 2018-1805 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 22, 2019).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: February 2025

    This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    De Facto Patent Reform In The Eastern District Of Texas

    Since the Supreme Court decided Alice in the summer of 2014, defendants increasingly have sought to invalidate patents under 35 U.S.C. § 101 at the very beginning of proceedings.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    December 2019 - Last Month At The Federal Circuit Podcast Series

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit – a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community. In this podcast
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Demonstration Of Fully Functional Prototype At Industry Trade Show Renders Asserted Claims Invalid Under Public Use Bar

    The '208 patent is directed to surgical devices for endometrial ablation to stop or reduce abnormal uterine bleeding.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Design Patents Take Center Stage

    The Supreme Court is now considering its first design patent case in 120 years. Design patents have historically occupied a more obscure spot in the U.S. patent system...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Developing Optional Feature Did Not Disrupt "Diligent" Reduction To Practice

    In ATI Technologies ULC v. Iancu, Nos. 2016-2222, -2406, -2608 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2019), the Federal Circuit reversed the Board's decision that certain claims of ATI Technologies'
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    DeviceTalks Weekly: What Does Medtronic's Puritan Reveal Mean For Medtech?

    Finnegan partner Brian Kacedon was a guest on the DeviceTalks Weekly podcast, where he discussed Medtronic's recent decision to make the intellectual property for their ventilators
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Disclosure Of Parent Genus Does Not Invalidate Species Claims

    In UCB Inc., v. Accord Healthcare Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's holding that UCB's patent on the anti-epileptic drug lacosamide was not rendered obvious by prior art.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Distributing Information Using Common Components Is A Patent-Ineligible, Abstract Idea

    In Sanderling Management LTD. v. Snap, Inc., No. 2021-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed a Central District of California decision dismissing Sanderling's patent...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 501–520 of 4412 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics