98 results found

The claims of the 206 Patent asserted against Apotex were subsequently held by Justice Snider to be invalid.

In Arctic Cat Inc v Bombardier Recreational Products, Justice Roy of the Federal Court dismissed Arctic Cat's action against Bombardier for infringement of Canadian Patent No. 2,322,738.

On September 18, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in BMS' appeal of a decision dismissing its prohibition application in respect of dasatinib and Canadian Patent Nos. 2,366,932 and 2,519,898.

On October 6, 2016, Justice Roy granted Camso's motion to stay the re-examination of Camso's 562 Patent until final judgment is rendered in an action in which the validity of the 562 Patent is being challenged ...

On November 15, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal issued its Reasons for Judgment in an appeal from an order that (1) granted the respondent's motion for security for costs ...

The Federal Court recently issued its decision in Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2017 FC 88, Teva's action for damages under section 8 of the PMNOC Regulations in relation..

In Mostar Directional Technologies Inc. v. Drill-Tek Corporation and Drill-Tek MWD Services Ltd., Mostar claimed patent infringement and inducement.

In Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd v. Ceramiche Caesar S.P.A., Justice Manson of the Federal Court allowed part of an appeal from a Trademarks Opposition Board decision refusing part of the requested scope of an application for the registration of the trademark.

Unwired Planet International v. Huawei, [2017] EWHC 711 is a UK case regarding the FRAND royalty rates applicable to patents that are deemed "essential."

On February 5, 2018, Justice LeBlanc released his Judgment and Reasons in 2018 FC 121 involving the applicant, Assurant, Inc. and the respondent, Assurancia, Inc.

In 2015, Specialized Desanders sued Dynacorp Fabricators (now Enercorp Sand Solutions) and Progress Energy Canada for infringement of Canadian Patent No, 2,407,544

On October 12, 2016 the Federal Court of Appeal released a number of judgments dealing with the circumstances in which a cross-referenced drug submission must readdress patents under the PM(NOC) Regulations.

Justice Manson's recent decision in Frac Shack Inc. v. AFD Petroleum Ltd., provides a framework for obviousness when dealing with a combination invention made from previously-known parts, and what constitutes a non-infringing alternative for the purpose of quantifying the defendant's profits.

Grey marketing is the practice of buying genuine branded products abroad and selling them in competition with a local distributor of the foreign vendor.

AAAI is an architecture firm that developed plans for a building project called "Murray's Walk" for MWDL.

On May 7, 2018 the Federal Court granted MIPS action in part, findings its patent valid but not infringed by Bauer's RE-AKT and RE-AKT 100 helmets while invalidating a single claim from the four Bauer patents at issue.

In the first PMNOC decision of the year, Justice Furlanetto upheld the validity of claims 1 and 2 of Alexion's patent no. 2,645,810 which is directed to the antibody...

In Times Group Corporation v. Time Development Group Inc. the Court granted a declaration of trade-mark infringement and an order that the respondent cease using the infringing mark.