98 results found

In Asics v 9153-2267 Quebec, Chief Justice Crampton of the Federal Court held that the Defendant in a trade-mark infringement case and its officers had shown cause why they should not be held in contempt of Court.

On November 18, 2016, Justice Nordheimer of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed Pfizer's motion for leave to appeal a decision that dismissed, with two exceptions, Pfizer's motion to strike various remedial claims made by Apotex ..

The decision significantly clarifies many aspects of the law of obviousness after the Supreme Court of Canada's seminal 2008 decision in Plavix 1

There was no evidence that it was so capable. It appears that the Board assumed that one merely had to dilute the 0.3% medicine to arrive at the 0.1% medicine capable of performing the same function.

In Microsoft v Liu, Justice Boswell of the Federal Court determined that Mr. Liu had infringed Microsoft's copyright in several programs and awarded Microsoft both statutory damages and exemplary and punitive damages.

The Federal Court recently dismissed a motion to amend pleadings in a patent dispute between Janssen Inc. and Pharmascience Inc.

In this trademarks appeal brought pursuant to section 56 of the Trademarks Act, the Federal Court overturned a decision by the Registrar of Trademarks to expunge a trademark after considering new evidence of use.

In Pollard Banknote Limited v. Babn Technologies Corp. and Scientific Games Products (Canada) ULC (2016 FC 1193), Justice Locke dealt with the issue of costs following his finding that the claims of Canadian Patent No. 2,752,551 were invalid or, in the alternative, not infringed ..

On January 26, 2017, the BCCA granted Vancouver Community College's appeal and held that it's passing off claim against Vancouver Career College had been established.

In Steelhead v. Arc Resources, the Federal Court considered the validity of Canadian Patent No. 3,027,085, which related generally to a water-based apparatus capable of liquefication of natural gas. This post focuses on the Court's discussion on anticipation

Sections 41.25 and 41.26 of the Copyright Act allow copyright owners to send notices of infringed copyright to ISPs, such as Rogers.

The Federal Court has reversed the Trade-marks Opposition Board in another decision dealing with the evidentiary standard applied in a section 45 proceeding.

In Geophysical Service Inc. v. The Queen, Prothonotary Tabib of the Federal Court struck GSI's Statement of claim.

Apotex filed a submission with Health Canada in 1988 for approval to sell a generic version of the drug trazadone.

In April 3rd, 2013, Bayer Cropscience filed a US patent application. The USPTO refused to award this application an April 3, 2013 filing date because the application did not include figures, a decision that Bayer Cropscience did not initially contest.

On September 15, 2016, Justice Boswell dismissed Richtree's appeal, pursuant to section 56 of the Trade-marks Act, from the decision of the Trade-marks Opposition Board that had rejected Richtree's opposition to a trade-mark application filed by Mövenpick.

U Box It opposed these application on the basis of confusion.