The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (“APTEL”), vide Order dated 05.05.2026 in the matter of Global Energy Private Limited v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, dismissed the applications filed by Global Energy Private Limited (“GEPL”) seeking condonation of delay and restoration of the appeal, which had earlier been dismissed for non-prosecution.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 22.06.2026 in Grew Energy Private Limited v. NTPC Renewable Energy Limited , held that where a specific provision governs a particular default, recourse must be had to such provision in preference to general provision.

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 07.05.2026 in the matter of Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission v Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited has held that consumers cannot be required to pay for depreciation costs for power plants which are no longer supplying electricity.

SEBI by way of circular dated 06.03.20261 (“MF Circular”), has introduced a voluntary lock in / debit freeze facility for Mutual Fund (“MF”) folios.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 06.07.2026 in Uday Narayan Shukla v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. , while reiterating the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution, dismissed a writ petition challenging an award of the Labour Court, upholding dismissal of employee from the service.

The IBBI, through notification dated 01.06.2026 has released the IBBI (Inspection and Investigation) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026 (“Inspection Amendment Regulations”) to amend the IBBI (Inspection and Investigation) Regulations, 2017 (“Inspection Principal Regulations”), in order to give effect to the changes brought about by the Amendment Act.

The High Court of Delhi through its judgment dated 23.07.2026 in the matter of Spectrum Power Generation Limited v. GAIL India Limited allowed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award rejecting the petitioner’s claim for reimbursement of Goods and Services Tax paid on transmission charges under a Gas Sale Agreement.

The High Court of Calcutta in the matter titled as Dr. Arjun Chowdhury v. State of West Bengal & Ors., through its judgement dated 18.06.2026, held that the Registrar, Office of the Registrar of Firms, Societies and Non-Trading Corporations (“Registrar”) cannot insist upon production or submission of a trade licence as a precondition for registration of a partnership firm formed for carrying on the professional practice of law.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 15.10.2025 in Gaurav Aggarwal v. Richa Gupta , held that an unregistered and unstamped Agreement to Sell executed in Uttar Pradesh is unenforceable in law and cannot form the basis of arbitration proceedings.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 15.06.2026 in Sunita v. Bajinder Kumar , dismissed a petition challenging the Trial Court’s order permitting inter alia the filing of a replication under Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC, holding that leave to file a replication may be granted where it is necessary for effective adjudication of issues.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 17.06.2026 in Anuj Goyal v. National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi & Ors. , dismissed a writ petition by holding that High Courts ought to ordinarily refrain from invoking their extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, where proceedings are pending before the competent tribunal.

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 23.06.2026 in the matter of Mohammed Khaleel (D) Through LRs & Ors. Jayamma held that a person seeking specific performance under The Specific Relief Act, 1963 needs to specifically aver and prove his continuous readiness and willingness to perform his obligations.

The Supreme Court of India, by way of its judgement dated 25.03.2026, in the matter of Nagaraj V. Mylandla v. P.I. Opportunities Fund-I and Others Etc.

SEBI, by way of Circular dated 14.08.2026 issued modifications in the regulatory framework for Online Bond Platform Providers (“OBPPs”), including ease-of doing-business measures (“OBPP Circular”). The OBPP Circular amends Chapter XXI of the SEBI Master Circular on issue and listing of non-convertible securities, Securitised Debt Instruments, Security Receipts, MDS and Commercial paper dated 15.10.2025 (“NCS Master Circular”).

The High Court of Delhi, through its Judgment dated 18.05.2026 in the matter of Moolchand Khairati Ram Hospital v. Vijender Singh & Ors., inter alia, held that the obligation under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (“ID Act”) is a continuing statutory obligation and takes into account the minimum wages revised from time to time by the Appropriate Government.

Under the repealed Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1995, paragraph 3(1) prescribed an employer’s contribution of 8.33% of the employee’s pay to the Pension Fund.

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (“MNRE”) through Office Memorandum dated 08.06.2026 (“OM”) waived factory inspections for higher power bin solar photovoltaic module (“PV Modules”) models within the same manufacturing facility.

SEBI, through notification dated 03.06.2026, issued the updated Master Circular for Alternative Investment Funds (“AIF Master Circular”), consolidating the circulars released by SEBI with respect to Alternate Investment Funds (“AIFs”) after the previous master circular on AIFs was issued on 07.05.2024 (“Existing Master Circular”).

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 02.06.2026 in the matter of National Highway Authority of India v T. Younis & Another held that the limitation period for filing an application challenging the arbitral award is to be computed from the date on which the application under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”) is disposed off by the arbitral tribunal.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 18.05.2026 in the matter of M/s R.C. Sood & Co. Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Sharad Maheshwari & Anr., dismissed an appeal challenging the decree of District Judge directing refund of INR 18,00,000/- to the purchasers in a real estate dispute arising out of cancellation of a villa allotment and alleged forfeiture of earnest money.