The High Court of Delhi, by way of its judgment dated 25.03.2026, in the matter of Smt. Bindu Sharma v. Kapil Sud & Anr.

The High Court held that while the executive is competent to prescribe cut-off dates, such classification must satisfy the twin tests under Article 14 of the Constitution. It was further observed that since the Circular created an artificial classification having no rational or nexus with its object of mitigating hardship, it is arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional. Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court struck down the Clause B of the Circular.

The High Court of Karnataka, through its judgment dated 15.06.2026 in Sri. Shivakumar C.L. v. State Information Commissioner & Anr. , dismissed a writ petition challenging the Karnataka Information Commission’s orders imposing penalty under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”).

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 04.02.2026 in M/s Eminent Colonizers Private Limited v. Rajasthan Housing Board & Ors....

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 06.11.2025 in M/s Alchemist Hospitals Limited v M/s ICT Health Technology Services India Private Limited held that party autonomy is foundational for any reference to arbitration under Section 7 of the A&C Act.

The Supreme Court, through its judgment dated 04.02.2026 in Ankhim Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Zaveri Construction Pvt. Ltd....

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 03.11.2025 in MMTC Limited v. Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Ltd. , held that objections to the enforcement of an arbitral award under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("CPC") lies within a narrow compass.

The Supreme Court, through its judgment dated 29.10.2025 in Annamalai v. Vasanthi & Ors. , clarified the circumstances under which a plaintiff must first seek a declaration that the termination of the contract is invalid before pursuing specific performance of the contract.

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 10.11.2025 in MITC rolling Mills Private Limited and Another v M/S Renuka Realtors & Ors.

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 01.04.2026 in Rajiv Gaddh v. Subodh Parkash , held that a party abandoning earlier arbitral proceedings cannot subsequently file a fresh application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”) on the same cause of action.

Where the question of pursing a constitutional remedy is involved and invocation of writ jurisdiction is traceable to Article 226(1), the doctrine of forum non conveniens may rarely apply.

The dispute arose out of recovery proceedings initiated by Indian Bank as Secured Creditor, against a borrower who had availed financial assistance in 1984, for which G. Ramanujam (“Guarantor”) had mortgaged his immovable property

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 08.05.2026 in the matter of Sheikh Abedin v Iqbal Ahmed & Another held that final decree under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) can be passed, based on admission made in course of criminal proceedings.

SEBI has introduced significant amendments to InvIT, AIF, and REIT regulations, lowering credit risk thresholds for liquid mutual funds and expanding investment flexibility.

The Supreme Court in the matter of Regenta Hotels Private Limited v. Hotel Grand Centre Point & Ors., through its judgment dated 07.01.2026 held that arbitral proceedings commence for all statutory purposes on the date the opposite party receives ...

The Supreme Court in the matter of Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Airports Authority of India through its judgment dated 05.01.2026 held that mere participation in arbitral proceedings does not lead to a waiver of the disqualification ...

The Supreme Court of India, through its judgment dated 20.05.2026 in the matter of Punjab State Power Corporation Limited v. Talwandi Sabo Power Limited & Ors., allowed the appeals filed by Punjab State Load Despatch Centre (“PSLDC”) and Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (“PSPCL”).

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), by Circular dated 11.08.2026 (“ILMDS Amendment Circular”), has notified amendments to the SEBI (Issue and Listing of Municipal Debt Securities) Regulations, 2015 (“ILMDS Regulation”) in respect of certain operational aspects for municipal debt securities (“MDS”).

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 06.07.2026 in Uday Narayan Shukla v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. , while reiterating the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution, dismissed a writ petition challenging an award of the Labour Court, upholding dismissal of employee from the service.

The High Court of Delhi through its judgment dated 23.07.2026 in the matter of Spectrum Power Generation Limited v. GAIL India Limited allowed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award rejecting the petitioner’s claim for reimbursement of Goods and Services Tax paid on transmission charges under a Gas Sale Agreement.