The Supreme Court of India, by way of its judgement dated 23.03.2026 in the matter of Central Transmission Utility of India Limited v. Sumit Binani & Ors.

MoLE through notification dated 01.07.2026 (“ECR Notification”) , has specified the employer’s contribution rate to the Insurance Fund established under the SS Code.

The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, by its order dated 14.08.2026 in Petition No. 5/SM/2026, has approved the procedure for levy of compensation charges permitting connectivity grantees additional time to achieve the milestones prescribed under the CERC (Connectivity and General Network Access to the inter-State Transmission System) Regulations, 2022.

CERC through its judgement dated 07.03.2026 in the matter of Spectrum Power Generation Limited v. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited & Ors. held that REC Power Development and Consultancy Limited (“RECPDCL”), ...

The Petition was filed seeking recovery of INR 2.26 crores towards interest from Central Transmission Utility of India Limited (“CTUIL”) on account of alleged delay in reimbursement of INR 19.40 crore paid as excess transmission charges for the months of October and November 2020 under the Point of Connection (“PoC”) billing mechanism.

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (“MoEFCC”), through Notification dated 20.05.2026 published a draft notification proposing amendments to the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, proposing extension of the validity period of environmental clearances granted to ports and harbours from the existing 10 (ten) years to 15 (fifteen) years, inviting comments from stakeholders within 60 (sixty) days from publication of the Draft EIA Notification i.e., 20.05.2026.

SEBI has introduced significant amendments to InvIT, AIF, and REIT regulations, lowering credit risk thresholds for liquid mutual funds and expanding investment flexibility.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 19.06.2026 in M/s EG Communications Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Election Commission of India & Ors. , dismissed a challenge to the directions prohibiting political advertisements at Delhi Metro stations during the operation of the Model Code of Conduct (“MCC”) on the ground that it is not violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India, 1949 (“Constitution”).

The NCLAT held that the corporate debtor is a separate juristic person and is distinct from other group entities of its group company and each group company has undergone separate corporate insolvency resolution process and later on liquidation proceedings.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 16.06.2026 in Smt. Khatiza Begam v. Ms. Salma Khan , dismissed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), by relying on the settled law that the jurisdiction of the Second Appellate Court is confined to cases involving a substantial question of law and cannot be invoked for reappreciation of evidence or factual findings.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 15.06.2026 in NBCC India Limited v. GNC Infra LLP & Anr., allowed a petition challenging an order directing NBCC India Limited to deposit the suit amount before the Trial Court, holding that a garnishee order cannot be passed unless there exists a crystallised or admitted liability of the garnishee towards the judgment-debtor.

The High Court of Delhi, by way of its judgment dated 25.03.2026, in the matter of Smt. Bindu Sharma v. Kapil Sud & Anr.

The High Court held that while the executive is competent to prescribe cut-off dates, such classification must satisfy the twin tests under Article 14 of the Constitution. It was further observed that since the Circular created an artificial classification having no rational or nexus with its object of mitigating hardship, it is arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional. Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court struck down the Clause B of the Circular.

The High Court of Karnataka, through its judgment dated 15.06.2026 in Sri. Shivakumar C.L. v. State Information Commissioner & Anr. , dismissed a writ petition challenging the Karnataka Information Commission’s orders imposing penalty under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”).

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 01.04.2026 in Rajiv Gaddh v. Subodh Parkash , held that a party abandoning earlier arbitral proceedings cannot subsequently file a fresh application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”) on the same cause of action.

Where the question of pursing a constitutional remedy is involved and invocation of writ jurisdiction is traceable to Article 226(1), the doctrine of forum non conveniens may rarely apply.

The dispute arose out of recovery proceedings initiated by Indian Bank as Secured Creditor, against a borrower who had availed financial assistance in 1984, for which G. Ramanujam (“Guarantor”) had mortgaged his immovable property

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 08.05.2026 in the matter of Sheikh Abedin v Iqbal Ahmed & Another held that final decree under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) can be passed, based on admission made in course of criminal proceedings.

SEBI has introduced significant amendments to InvIT, AIF, and REIT regulations, lowering credit risk thresholds for liquid mutual funds and expanding investment flexibility.

The Supreme Court of India, through its judgment dated 20.05.2026 in the matter of Punjab State Power Corporation Limited v. Talwandi Sabo Power Limited & Ors., allowed the appeals filed by Punjab State Load Despatch Centre (“PSLDC”) and Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (“PSPCL”).