Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    High Court Of Delhi Held That Arbitrator Does Not Have Discretion To Fix Seat Of Arbitration In Case Of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause

    The High Court of Delhi, by its judgement dated 01.07.2025 in M/s Viva Infraventure Pvt. Ltd. v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority held arbitrator's discretion to determine the seat of arbitration cannot override the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the agreement.
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    High Court Of Delhi Held That Mere Pendency Of Complaint Does Not Render Arbitrator De Jure Ineligible Under Section 14

    The High Court held that de jure ineligibility under Section 14(1)(a) must stem from circumstances prescribed by law, such as those enumerated under the Seventh Schedule of the A&C Act and cannot be inferred from mere complaints or unsubstantiated allegations.
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    High Court Of Delhi Holds That An Objection To Territorial Jurisdiction Cannot Be Raised At A Belated Stage, And Such Objection Is Deemed To Have Been Waived

    The High Court of Delhi, by way of its judgment dated 25.03.2026 in the matter of Hanuman Prasad Sharma @ H.P. Sharma v. J. Mithyleshwar , held that objections relating to territorial jurisdiction must be raised...
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    High Court Of Madras Held That Deliberate Nonparticipation Cannot Defeat The Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Award

    The High Court held that the issuance of a No Objection Certificate ("NOC") and the related communications have established a concluded contract
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    Supreme Court Reiterated That The Venue Of Arbitration Does Not Confer Jurisdiction On The Courts Rather The Seat Of The Arbitration Does.

    The Supreme Court, through its judgement dated 15.04.2026 in the matter of J&K Economic Reconstruction Agency v Rash Bilders Indian Private Limited reiterated that the venue of arbitration does not confer jurisdiction on the courts rather the seat of the arbitration does.
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    Supreme Court Held That Attachment Orders Under Benami Act Cannot Be Challenged Under IBC

    The Supreme Court, through its judgment dated 24.02.2026 in S. Rajendran v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax...
    IndiaTax
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    IBBI Notifies The IBBI (Liquidation Process) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2026

    IBBI, vide notification dated 19.05.2026 has notified the IBBI (Liquidation Process) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2026 (“Liquidation Amendment Regulations”) to amend the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 (“Liquidation Principal Regulations”).
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    MCA Issues Companies (Registration Offices And Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026.

    The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”), by notification dated 21.04.20266, has issued the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules...
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    MCA Notifies Companies (Registered Valuers And Valuation) Amendment Rules, 2026

    The MCA through Notification No. G.S.R. 432(E) dated 01.06.2026, has notified the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Amendment Rules, 2026 (“Valuation Amendment Rules”), to amend the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017 (“Valuation Principal Rules”).
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    NCLAT Holds That Jurisdiction Exercised By The Adjudicating Authority Must Be Tested With Reference To The Source Of The Relief Granted

    The NCLAT, Principal Bench through its judgment dated 03.08.2026 in the matter of Ammeet Kumar Agarwal vs. Ssarvi Resolution Services LLP, Resolution Professional of Supreme Transport Organisation Pvt. Ltd., affirmed the order of the NCLT, Mumbai directing the suspended directors of the Corporate Debtor to jointly and severally restore funds to the Corporate Debtor’s account withdrawn during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    SEBI Amends ICDR Regulations To Introduce Draft Abridged Prospectus And Revises Disclosure Requirements.

    The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) by way of notification dated 16.03.2026, has issued the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements)...
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    Supreme Court Holds That Trading While In Possession Of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information Attracts The Presumption Of Insider Trading, Irrespective Of Motive Or Profit

    The Supreme Court of India, through its judgment dated 11.08.2026 in Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Rajeev Vasant Sheth and Others , set aside the order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (“SAT”) and restored the finding of insider trading recorded by SEBI against the promoters of Tara Jewels Limited.
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    MNRE Issued OM For ALMM List Applicability Post 01.06.2026

    MNRE, vide Office Memorandum dated 25.05.2026 (“ALMM OM”) has specified that there will be no extension of the requirement to mandatorily source solar cells and modules from Approved List of Models and Manufacturers (“ALMM”) by net metering and open access renewable power projects getting commissioned on or after 01.06.2026.
    IndiaEnergy and Natural Resources
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    MNRE Notified A Limited Window Extension To Net Metering And Open Access RE Power Projects Exemption From ALMM List-II Till 31.12.2026

    MNRE by Office Memorandum dated 18.07.2026 notified an extended limited window for Net-Metering and Open Access renewable projects, for exemption from Approved List of Models and Manufacturers List-II (for solar PV cells) till 31.12.2026.
    IndiaEnergy and Natural Resources
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    President Of India Sanctions Implementation Of Small Hydro Power Development Scheme From 1 MW To 25 MW

    The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (“MNRE”), vide Notification dated 15.05.2026 , has conveyed administrative approval for implementation of the Small Hydro Power (“SHP”) Development Scheme (“SHP Scheme”) for SHP projects ranging from 1 MW to 25 MW capacity for the period FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31, with a total financial outlay of INR 2,584.60 Crores.
    IndiaEnergy and Natural Resources
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    SEBI Amends Alternative Investment Funds Regulations, 2012

    SEBI, by notification dated 16.04.2026 , has notified the SEBI (Alternative Investment Fund) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026 (“AIF Amendment Regulations”) amending the SEBI (Alternate Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (“AIF Regulations”).
    IndiaFinance and Banking
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    SEBI Approves Open Market Buy-backs, Utilization Of Intraday Borrowings By Mutual Funds And Amendments To SDI Regulations

    SEBI through its press release having no. 33/2026, dated 19.06.2026 (“Press Release”) , has notified the key decisions taken at the 214th meeting of its Board.
    IndiaFinance and Banking
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    IBBI Notifies The IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process For Corporate Persons) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2026

    The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (“IBBI”), vide notification dated 19.05.2026, has notified the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2026) (“CIRP Amendment Regulations”) to amend the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (“CIRP Principal Regulations”).
    IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    APTEL Partly Allows Review Petition And Reiterates Scope Of Intervention In Review Proceedings

    The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (“APTEL”), vide judgment dated 06.04.2026 in Review Petition No. 5 of 2025 in Appeal No. 126 of 2022 (“Review Petition”) partly allowed the Review Petition granting carrying cost on liquidated damages while reaffirming the limited scope of intervention in review proceedings.
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    Supreme Court Holds That An Arbitral Award Can Be Challenged On The Ground Of Lack Of Arbitration Agreement, Even After The Party Challenging It Has Participated In The Arbitration Proceedings.

    The Supreme Court of India, by way of its judgement dated 24.03.2026 in the matter of M/s. Bharat Udyog Limited v. Ambernath Municipal Council Through Commissioner & Anr.1, held that even though a party...
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal

Showing 141–160 of 316 results

PreviousNext