The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 03.02.2026 in C. Velusamy v. K. Indhera, held that an application under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act")...

The Supreme Court, through its judgement dated 24.04.2026 in the matter of Home Care Retail Marts Private Limited v Haresh N. Sanghavi held that any party to an arbitration agreement, including an unsuccessful party in arbitration, may invoke Section 9 of the A&C Act at the post-award stage.

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 02.06.2026 in the matter of National Highway Authority of India v T. Younis & Another held that the limitation period for filing an application challenging the arbitral award is to be computed from the date on which the application under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”) is disposed off by the arbitral tribunal.

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 06.02.2026 in M/s Nav Nirman Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. v Union of India held that, once an order confirming attachment under Section 8(3)...

The Supreme Court of India, by way of its judgement dated 20.03.2026 in the matter of Ujaas Energy Limited v. West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited...

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 10.04.2026 in the matter of Ram Chandra Choudhary & Others v Roop Nagar Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Samiti Limited & Others held that District Co-operative Milk Unions (District Milk Unions) are not ‘State’ under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950.

Finally, the countdown begins for the implementation of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act which ushers in a new era in India of treating personal data of an individual as their own valuable property rather than a commodity...

The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, vide circular no. F1/998/REGN.BR/DIV.COMM./HQ /14/3325 dated 13.10.2025 ("Stamp Duty Circular") , in compliance with the directions of the High Court of Delhi in Amit Gupta vs. Government of NCT Of Delhi & Others.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 18.05.2026 in the matter of M/s R.C. Sood & Co. Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Sharad Maheshwari & Anr., dismissed an appeal challenging the decree of District Judge directing refund of INR 18,00,000/- to the purchasers in a real estate dispute arising out of cancellation of a villa allotment and alleged forfeiture of earnest money.

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 05.05.2026 in the matter of Alpha Corp Development Private Limited v Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) and Others held that the corporate veil of holding companies may be lifted during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) where subsidiary companies are inextricably connected so as to form part of one concern.

The High Court of Delhi, by its order dated 16.01.2026, in the matter of Malabar Gold and Diamond Limited & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., held that investigating agencies do not have power under Section 106...

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy by its office memorandum dated 14.07.2026 has issued a clarification with respect to the amendment to ‘Revised Guidelines for installation of prototype wind turbine models issued on 25.06.2026 (“Wind Turbine Model Guidelines”)’.

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission (“TNERC”), through its order dated 06.03.2026 in the matter of Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited v.

SEBI, by notification dated 10.07.2026, published on 14.07.2026, has notified the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2026 (“LODR Amendment”) amending the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR Regulations”).

The High Court of Delhi through its judgment dated 12.02.2026 in Avantha Holdings Limited v. ICICI Bank Limited & Ors. while applying the principle of parity held that where substantial delay on one side is overlooked, …

The NCLT, Special Bench, Kolkata through its judgment dated 18.06.2026, in Indian Bank vs. Santosh Jhawar, Personal Guarantor of M/s Burgundy Life Style Pvt. Ltd. , held that an acknowledgment of liability by Principal Borrower extends the limitation period for Personal Guarantor and maintainability of a Section 95 proceeding is not conditioned upon prior initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) against the Principal Borrower.

The High Court of Bombay, by way of its judgment dated 24.03.2026 in M/s. Lahoti Properties & Ors. v. Gangabhishan & Ors., has held that withdrawal of a suit with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action does not permit the plaintiff to introduce new or additional reliefs in the subsequent suit, ...

The High Court of Delhi, by way of its judgment dated 25.03.2026 in the matter of Hanuman Prasad Sharma @ H.P. Sharma v. J. Mithyleshwar , held that objections relating to territorial jurisdiction must be raised...

The Supreme Court, through its judgement dated 15.04.2026 in the matter of J&K Economic Reconstruction Agency v Rash Bilders Indian Private Limited reiterated that the venue of arbitration does not confer jurisdiction on the courts rather the seat of the arbitration does.

The Supreme Court, through its judgment dated 24.02.2026 in S. Rajendran v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax...