1,061 results found

The period of trial is a period of uncertainty as the existence of a legal right and its alleged violation both are contested. These issues remain uncertain till they are resolved in a trial. During the pendency of a trial interlocutory injunction is granted to mitigate the risk of injustice or to protect the plaintiff against any injury afflicted by violation of his right if the issues were to be resolved in the favour of the plaintiff.

While disposing of I.A. 10533/2024 for injunction in a patent infringement dispute over a biosimilar of Nivolumab between E. R. Squibb and Sons, LLC & Ors. vs Zydus Lifesciences Limited, the Delhi High Court issued a preliminary injunction order on July 18, 2025, restraining Zydus Lifesciences from launching its nivolumab biosimilar.

The appellant submitted that the respondent refused their patent application on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step under Section 2(1)(j) of the Patent Act, 1970, without giving adequate reasons.

In the case of Saint Gobain Glass France vs Assistant Controller of Patents C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 13/2024, the key issue before the Delhi High Court in the appeal against the refusal of a patent was whether the invention lacked novelty and inventive step.

The convergence of rapid advances in Artificial Intelligence, particularly tools that create audio-visual content indistinguishable from reality, such as deepfakes...

Roche vs. Cipla marks the end of the first phase of a key battle between big pharma and the Indian generic industry.

On May 8, 2024, in the case of Guala Closures Spa ("plaintiff") and Agi Greenpac Limited ("defendant"), the single Judge of the Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiff's application for an interim injunction alleging infringement ...

With the liberalization policy geared in, the country has been witnessing a rapid transformation in all sectors and software has emerged as one of the vital aspect of trade and commerce. Of late, the Apex Court in India had an opportunity to determine the scope of the software as ‘goods’ to attract levy of sales tax.

New use of known substance always remain out of the purview of patent protection perhaps for the very reason that the discovery of new property of a known substance is not inventive enough to qualify for patentability...

Geographical Indications (GIs) represent one of the most culturally significant and economically valuable forms of intellectual property.

Continuation of a parent patent application, even after the examination of the original patent is over, remains a fallback option at the hand of the patentee to keep the patent application alive.

In Indian trademark jurisprudence, courts have consistently emphasised that not every appealing or expressive word can claim exclusive ownership.

Section 15 of the Patent Act empowers the Controller to refuse a patent if an applicant fails to comply with the requirements of the Patent Act or the Patent Rules.

Under Indian design laws, a ‘design' has been defined as "features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament or composition of lines or colour or combination thereof applied to any article whether two-dimensional or three-dimensional or in both forms.

In law of trademarks, words that are distinctive enough to distinguish goods or services of one person from those of others, qualify to be protected against infringement and/or passing off.

The division of any patent application and its admissibility under Section 16 of the Patents Act, 1970, have seen many ups and downs in the patent practice and jurisprudence in India.

Consent is the cornerstone of data privacy as envisaged under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 ("DPDPA").