On 17 December 2021, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed a cumulative penalty of ₹ 202 crores (₹ 2.02 billion) on Amazon for 'misleading' the Indian anti-trust regulator...

When news broke about Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) acquiring over 1% shareholding in one of India's largest housing finance company, the Housing Development Financial Corporation (HDFC)...

The Uniform Code for Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices (UCPMP) was notified by the Department of Pharmaceuticals (DoP) in 2014 as a voluntary code to be adhered by pharmaceutical companies...

NCLAT in its recent judgment in Jayesh N. Sanghrajka erstwhile R.P. of Ariisto Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Monitoring Agency nominated by Committee of Creditors of Ariisto Developers Pvt. Ltd. held that a resolution professional ...

The Supreme Court, in the recent case of M/s Tirupati Steels v. M/s Shubh Industrial Component & Anr., held that the pre-deposit of 75% of the awarded amount as per Section...

A lot of information is available on the internet today, regarding applicability of 'force majeure' clauses to the disruptions caused in business activities due to the prevailing COVID-19 crisis.

The Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India Act, 2025 (act) is an important step in supporting India’s nuclear energy ambitions and AI-enabled nuclear technologies.

India v. SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd., held that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) and the RBI Guidelines do not prevail over each other as they have different scope and purpose.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) aims to revive debtor entities facing financial stress.

In recent times, several noteworthy judgments have been rendered by the Indian courts and tribunals in matters involving the insolvency law framework.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the recent matter of Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and Ors. while deciding upon a property dispute empathetically discussed the plight of the decree holders and the challenges they face ...

In a recent decision in South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. & Ors. v. M/s. S. Kumar's Associates AKM (JV), the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that mere issuance of a letter of intent would not create a binding contractual relationship ...

In a recent order passed in the matter of Union of India v. M/s Associated Construction Co. , the Hon'ble Supreme Court highlighted the uncertainty surrounding the period of limitation applicable on appeals filed under Section 37.

The commencement of the new Financial Year beginning April 1, 2017, brings a paradigm shift in the fiscal and tax landscape in India.

The Government of India vide Circular No. - 178/10/2022 – GST dated 3rd August, 2022 clarified the applicability of GST on payments, which are typically penal in nature and arise out of a breach of contract or otherwise.

Upon execution of a mortgage, a lender believes that a valid security is in place and could be enforced if the borrower defaults in repayment.

At a time when India was struck with piling defaults in debt and the debt recovery laws were failing badly, it was realised that mere debt recovery would not address the damage being inflicted by the non-performing assets (NPAs).

The District Commission dismissed the complaint filed by the Respondent on the ground of the aforesaid non-disclosure.

The High Court of Delhi (High Court), in the recent judgment of Union of India, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board v. M/S Jindal Rail Infrastructure Limited, held that it is not open for the arbitral tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court") recently dismissed five Review Petitions seeking review of the judgment passed in State Tax Officer vs. Rainbow Papers Limited.