Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Stellantis Auto SAS & Ors v Autoliv AB & Ors

    The Competition Appeal Tribunal mandated a single joint expert for economic evidence in a complex case involving multiple defendants, emphasizing the principles of just and proportionate case management. The Court of Appeal upheld this decision, noting that single joint experts are not limited to low-value or uncontroversial cases.
    United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Did A Side Agreement Serve To Discharge Liability Under A Bond?

    In the case of Hackney Empire Ltd v Aviva Insurance UK Ltd, [2011] EWHC 2378 (TCC), Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart had to consider the effect of a side agreement, which varied the existing contract, on a bond.
    United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Case Summary: Baker Hughes v Dynamic Industries

    The Plaintiff, Baker Hughes Saudi Arabia Co. Ltd ("Baker Hughes"), entered into a contract with the Defendants ("Dynamic Industries") to supply materials, products and services for an oil and gas project...
    United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    DNB Bank v Eyadah: Jurisdiction of the DIFC Courts

    DNB Bank ASA was seeking recognition and enforcement of an English High Court order in the United Arab Emirates by bringing an action in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Court.
    United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Morris v Williams

    Morris brought a claim for personal injuries sustained in a road traffic accident in July 2018. Negligence was not in dispute, and although Morris suffered some injuries...
    United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    The Renaissance Club At Archerfield LLP v BVB Sureties Limited

    A Scottish court examines whether a performance bond demand met contractual requirements when the beneficiary's written claim contained general breach descriptions, exceeded the bond's maximum amount, and was signed by someone with an unconventional title. The case explores how courts apply the "reasonable recipient" test to determine if technical imperfections in demand notices should invalidate otherwise clear claims.
    United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Adjudication: Was There A Contract And/Or Was There a Contract Evidenced In Writing?

    One of the changes due to be introduced to the adjudication legislative regime, is to scrap the requirement that only those contracts which are in writing or at least are evidenced in writing are suitable for adjudication.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    ATG Services (Scotland) LTD Against Ogilvie Construction LTD

    In [2024] CSOH 94, Ogilvie contested an adjudicator's £1 million decision, arguing breaches of natural justice over an interim payment application. The court upheld the adjudicator's ruling, noting Ogilvie's failure to argue effectively against ATG's course of conduct defense. Lord Sandison emphasized that Ogilvie had no grounds for a natural justice breach, reinforcing the policy of "pay now, argue later." Unreasonable defenses led to an award of indemnity costs against Ogilvie.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Drafting Exclusion Clauses: Say What You Mean

    When negotiating construction contracts, it is often the case that either or both parties will want to exclude or limit their liability in some way. For example, consultants will frequently try to limit their liability to match their professional indemnity insurance coverage
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Ltd

    In a dispute over FES's entitlement to loss and expense under the SBC/Q/Scot contract, the court upheld the adjudicator's decision that FES's failure to comply with the notice requirement in clause 4.21 barred their claim. Lord Carloway emphasized the clarity of the contract's wording, affirming that notice was a condition precedent for recovery.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    FIDIC Issue Guidance On DAB Decisions

    The FIDIC Contracts Committee has issued a Guidance Note dealing with the powers of, effect of and the enforcement of Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) decisions.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    How Do You Decide If A Claim For Breach Of The Public Procurement Regulations Was Brought Outside The Statutory 3-Month Limit?

    In the case of Mears Limited v Leeds City Council [2011] EWHC 40 (QB) Mr Justice Ramsey had to decide whether proceedings commenced by a disappointed tenderer had been brought out of time.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Lapp Industries Ltd v 1st Formations Ltd

    Lapp sought summary enforcement of an adjudicator's decision. Lapp had sent an application for interim payment in the sum of £120k. No payment or payless notice was served.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    LCIA Costs And Duration Data

    There is little doubt that international arbitration can be an expensive process. Against this background, on 3 November 2015, the LCIA released data on the average costs and durations of the arbitrations that it administers.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Retentions: Carry On Consulting?

    In late 2022 I had the pleasure of working with both the CLC and the NEC to produce the NEC and CLC Guidance Note for dealing with retentions in NEC3 and NEC4 construction contracts.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Should a Stay be Granted Under Section 9 of the 1996 Arbitration Act?

    [2010] EWHC 3415 (TCC), Mr Justice Akenhead had to consider whether a stay should be granted under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996. This was essentially a matter of examining the dispute resolution provisions within the subcontract to ascertain whether the parties had, or had not, chosen arbitration.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    The ICE Payment Notice Dispute Model Adjudication Procedure: Worth Considering?

    The Institution of Civil Engineers ("ICE") has recently published a Payment Notice Dispute Adjudication Procedure (the "Procedure"). In other words, there is now a specific procedure for dealing with "smash and...
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    The Risks Of Refusing To Mediate

    There have been a number of cases where the courts have expressed a desire to encourage parties to mediate especially where the costs of resolving the dispute are likely to be disproportionate to the amounts at stake.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    The Use Of Statutory Demands – A Reminder

    Moorside Investments Ltd v DAG Construction Ltd [2007] EWHC 7795/07, which came before HHJ Wilson, serves as a useful reminder as to when statutory demands can be used to recover outstanding debt.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Visa Inc And Others v Luxottica Retail UK Ltd

    A Commercial Court judgment examines whether a broadly-worded settlement agreement covering multilateral interchange fee claims extends to encompass litigation brought by a company that became an associated...
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP

Showing 41–60 of 599 results

PreviousNext