Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Intelligence
  • Search

603 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Deerns UK Ltd v VDC LHR11 Ltd

    A construction dispute examines whether a contract's payment mechanism complied with the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, specifically focusing on whether the final date for payment was properly fixed. The case turns on the interpretation of contract provisions that allowed the final payment date to shift based on late invoice submission, while the due date remained static.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    What Is The Current Approach Of The Courts When A Party Refuses To Mediate? P4 Limited v Unite Integrated Solutions Plc.

    Following the Court of Appeal decisions in the cases of Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust and Steel v Joy and Halliday [2004] EWCA Civ 576, which were decided together in May 2004, the position of the Courts was clear. Parties were to be encouraged to settle their disputes through ADR.
    United Kingdom
Real Estate and Construction
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Are You Ready For The Reform Of The Construction Industry Scheme?

    The Construction Industry Scheme ("CIS") which is, as the name suggests, a special tax deduction scheme for the construction industry, was introduced in 1972, partly in response to the issue of engaging workers on a cash-payment basis. Parliament sought to ensure that National Insurance and PAYE tax was paid where appropriate.
    United KingdomStrategy
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    International Arbitration - The New Liberal Approach Of The English Court Of Appeal

    The Court of Appeal in their recent decision in the case of Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation & Ors v Privalov & Ors [2007 EWCA Civ 20] have indicated that a new approach needs to be taken by the English courts when considering questions relating to the jurisdiction of arbitration clauses in international commercial contracts.
    United KingdomStrategy
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Subcontracting Under UAE Law

    Subcontracting is common in the modern construction industry.
    United Arab EmiratesReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    FIDIC Termination For Convenience Payment Did Not Cover Cancellation Charges Payable Under Subcontracts

    Even though FIDIC contracts are widely used around the world, it can be hard to find judicial guidance on interpretation of standard terms of FIDIC contracts (because they are often considered in confidential arbitrations).
    United KingdomEnergy and Natural Resources
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Late Payments: You're Really On Thin Ice Now

    This recent decision should sound as a stark warning to Employers under JCT contracts over the perils of failing to make payments on time.
    United KingdomFinance and Banking
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Privy Council On Without Prejudice Privilege

    The recent Privy Council1 case of A&A Mechanical Contractors and Company Ltd v Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad and Tobago)2 provides guidance on without prejudice privilege.
    United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Football Fever: On The Pitch And In The Court!

    A striking coincidence? On 24 June 2019: England beat Norway to secure a place in a World Cup semi-final and on 24 June 2018 England beat Panama 6-1 in the World Cup group stages, on route to a World Cup semi-final.
    United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Providence Building Services Ltd v Hexagon Housing Association Ltd

    Providence's attempt to terminate its contract with Hexagon under clause 8.9.4 of the JCT Design and Build Contract 2016 was deemed invalid. The court ruled that termination requires an unresolved default under clause 8.9.3, which had not occurred.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Adjudication – In The Absence Of A Withholding Notice Was The Adjudicator Wrong Not To Consider A Party’s Counterclaim?

    In the adjudication enforcement case of Urang Commercial Ltd v (1) Century Investments Ltd (2) Eclipse Hotels (Luton) Ltd, [2011] EWHC 1561 (TCC), Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart was faced with two questions.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    BNP Paribas Depository Services Ltd & Anor v Briggs & Forrester Engineering Services Ltd

    A UK court ruled that under a design and build contract, B&F was responsible for identifying and removing unforeseen asbestos and addressing structural defects, as risk allocation clauses firmly placed responsibility on the contractor, invalidating B&F's termination.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Can A Liquidator Adjudicate A Dispute That Arose Under A Construction Contract?

    In August 2018, in Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Limited v Bresco Electrical Services Limited (In Liquidation) Mr Justice Fraser had the opportunity in the context of CPR Part 8 proceedings to clarify whether or not ...
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Claims Consultants: Proceed With Caution

    There is an increasing tendency in the construction industry to use claims consultants and claims management companies as a cost-effective alternative to instructing lawyers, either in a project management function, or as a precursor to litigation being commenced.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Disputes Arising "Under" Or "Out Of Or In Connection With" A Contract

    In our article headed International Arbitration - The New Liberal Approach Of The English Court Of Appeal dated 15 February 2007, we discussed the approach the Court of Appeal when being asked to consider arguments relating to the distinction, if any, between disputes arising "under" a contract and disputes arising "out of" a contract.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    FIDIC Notice Of Contractor Claim Under Sub-Clause 20.1 Required Where Variation Procedure Not Followed

    Last year, I wrote in International Quarterly, Issue 40 about a recent Privy Council decision relating to a FIDIC-based contract and said it was a rare treat...
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Is There A Duty Of Good Faith In Construction Contracts?

    The rise of the use of partnering contracts and other contracts such as the NEC that expressly refer to phrases such as ‘mutual trust and co-operation’ and ‘good faith’ has turned the spotlight onto the general obligations of parties to construction contracts towards each other.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Making A Claim Under Sub-Clause 20.1 Of The FIDIC Form

    Cases in the courts involving the FIDIC form of contract are rare, because they tend to include an arbitration clause.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Northfield Property Solutions Ltd v Dykes & Anor

    The principal issue here for O'Farrell J was whether NPS was entitled to an extension of time for the issue of the claim form challenging an arbitration award beyond the 28-day statutory period.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Article

    Obtaining Security For Costs: Piercing That Corporate Veil

    Security for costs can be viewed in two ways. Either it provides some degree of costs protection to those faced by claims from apparently impecunious companies or it is a device wielded against smaller companies designed to stifle genuine claims.
    United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
    Fenwick Elliott LLP
  • Showing 241–260 of 603 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters