Dinsmore taxation associate Sierra Williams wrote an article for the American Bar Association's Journal of Affordable Housing titled "Power Couples: Twinning Opportunity Zones with Other Economic Tax Incentives."

As we noted in an earlier alert, organizations that failed to file returns for tax years 2007, 2008, and 2009 will automatically lose their exempt status this year.

As many of you know, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 amended the Internal Revenue Code to require the automatic revocation of the exempt status of organizations that fail to file required information returns with the IRS for three consecutive years.

The Multistate Tax Commission has undertaken an ambitious project on the state taxation of partnerships.

On September 9, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced its latest efforts to assert control over and regulate the Web3 ecosystem - an Office of Crypto Assets.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced on May 3, 2022 the near doubling of the unit responsible for protecting investors in crypto markets and from cyber-related threats by allocating 20 additional positions to that team.

Dinsmore product liability attorneys Christopher Jackson and Kyle Bunnell co-authored an article in the February edition of For the Record regarding how manufacturers and dealers can succeed in product liability claims.

On June 22, 2010, the Ohio Supreme Court issued its decision in "McFee v. Nursing Care Management of America, Inc."

Recently, the EEOC held an open meeting to "examine treatment of unemployed job seekers." During the meeting, several witnesses presented testimony on what some view as a growing problem in the current economy – discrimination against the jobless.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) recently published updates to FAQ #4 of its FAQs on Fraud and Abuse Authorities, emphasizing key considerations for the analysis...

In recent weeks, questions have arisen regarding what a municipality may do when a convicted sex offender chooses to reside within the municipal border.

The IRS continues to face resource and operational pressures, including staffing declines, leadership turnover, and the demands of implementing major legislation.

On June 27, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, a case where the Court took another look at school employees' First Amendment rights...

The Delaware Supreme Court issued a landmark decision on February 27, 2026, upholding the constitutionality of Senate Bill 21 (SB 21)...

In recent years, there has been an influx of wellness-based medical spas providing IV hydration, Botox and dermal fillers to patients. Following this surge, the State Medical Board of Ohio, the Ohio Board of Pharmacy...

While the decision is a substantial victory for 340B Program-participating hospitals, a number of questions remain, such as how HHS will refund affected entities...

Effective August 25, 2026, Ohio House Bill 377 will revise the law governing light-based medical devices used for hair removal. The law modifies physician delegation standards related to hair removal lasers and creates specific provisions for advanced practice registered nurse and physician assistant delegation.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has finalized significant new oversight requirements for accrediting organizations that accredit Medicare and Medicaid-participating providers and suppliers.

Artificial intelligence has made it possible to create convincing videos of athletes endorsing products without their knowledge or consent, fundamentally challenging what name, image and likeness (NIL) rights mean in practice. As deepfakes become more sophisticated and widespread, existing legal protections designed to give athletes and public figures control over their identities are proving inadequate against unauthorized commercial exploitation and reputational harm. This emerging threat requires busines

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently sanctioned two lawyers over $100,000 for citing hallucinated cases in their appellate briefs.