423 results found

The concept of medical malpractice broadly refers to the tort of negligence being pursued against a regulated health practitioner for actions carried on in the scope of one's medical practice.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the courts were unable to hold jury trials for many civil claims, particularly MVA and tort cases. This ended in May 2022, and jury trials for civil...

Whether an expense or service is "reasonable and necessary" is an important legal test in the context of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule ("the Schedule").

The application judge found that an oral agreement was made between Moore and the deceased in 2000, shortly after their separation, to the effect that she would pay the premiums from...

They are governed by provincial statutes.

In Kelly v. Guarantee Company of North America, the insured was injured in a motor vehicle accident on April 6, 2009.

The Landlord in Amexon wished to demolish a large commercial building in which the Tenant occupied leased premises, and redevelop the property.

The first case is Baroch v. Canada Cartage which dealt with a class action dispute relating to unpaid overtime.

Some employers do not see the value in executing employment contracts. However, without termination clauses which limit an employee's entitlements upon termination without cause, damages awarded can be significant.

The LAT Rules regarding disclosure are in conflict with the current case law on when surveillance should be disclosed.

Ontario's Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule provides home modification benefits for individuals with catastrophic injuries from motor vehicle accidents. This comprehensive analysis examines the legislative framework, practical application, and key legal precedents that determine when home renovations are deemed reasonable and necessary, exploring disputes over quantum, scope, and the balance between accommodation needs and windfall prevention.

Ms. Joaquim (the "Insured") was injured in a motor vehicle accident on January 12, 2017.

In bodily injury claims, there are typically two types of examination of the plaintiff that take place: (1) Examinations for Discovery, and (2) Independent Medical Examinations.

Recently, the public learned of a lawsuit against two children regarding a schoolyard incident in 2015.

On Monday, March 28, 2017, the Ontario Court of Appeal released their decision, Lloyd v. Bush, 2017 ONCA 252.

Expert evidence plays an important role in civil litigation, by providing information where the court does not have the requisite knowledge to make findings of facts that are relevant.

The interpretation of a corrosion exclusion was one of the major issues considered in the recent decision in MDS Inc. v Factory Mutual Insurance Company.

The issues that were before the court in 1465152 Ontario Limited v Amexon Development Inc.1 are substantial and far-reaching, particularly for the commercial real estate leasing industry.