The Ontario Court of Appeal in Di Filippo v Bank of Nova Scotia provides guidance on how to navigate limitations period issues when adding new defendants to an action based on information received...

The Limitation Act governs the limitation period for commencing an action in British Columbia.

On September 17, 2018, Justice Coroza of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released his decision in Bucknol v. 2280882 Ontario Inc1("Bucknol"), a motion for summary judgement dealing...

Effective July 1, 2017, the definition of a Road-Building Machine (RBM) will be narrowed, pursuant to Ontario Regulation 398/16.

Canadian businesses of all sizes face financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

What has been less clear is what "truly representing the facts" means.

The assessment of damages in personal injury claims is often challenging when dealing with injuries that cannot be measured objectively.

In Carmichael v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., the Court of Appeal for Ontario explored the evidence required in rebutting the presumption of capacity to suspend the running of the limitation period.

Mediation is a process in which a neutral third party assists the disputing parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution.

It is difficult to balance the risk of harm caused by delays with the court's limited resources and overworked administrators.

The doctrine of spoliation in Canada has evolved from the English common law. Spoliation refers to a rule of evidence when there is tampering, destruction, alteration or concealment of evidence.

In July 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Gillham v Lake of Bays (Township), wherein the Court of Appeal struggled with the issue of whether a claim made after the limitation period could be permitted.

The government of Ontario defines autonomous vehicle as a "driverless or self-driving vehicles that are capable of detecting the surrounding environment using artificial intelligence, sensors...

The world has gone through many changes in the past year, and the Ontario Small Claims Court is no exception.

Under the Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule ("Schedule"), those injured in a motor vehicle accident are entitled to different levels of benefits according to the severity and classification of their impairments.

In the recent decision of Caryk v Karlsson,1 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice refused to compel Erik Karlsson's wife to provide evidence relating to allegations that she was cyberbullied by the partner of one...

In Gustanar et al. v Minto et al. and Franick Rd. Service Inc, 2016 ONSC 2341, the court held that the co-defendant

In Ontario, the provincial legislation shows a commitment to protecting contractors and subcontractors by enabling them to collect outstanding balances owing for services and materials through the use of construction trusts, holdbacks and liens.

The accused, Marc Cyr-Langlois, was stopped by two police officers while driving.

Two recent Ontario Court of Appeal decisions have provided clarity on the uncertain relationship between tort damage awards and Statutory Accident Benefits (SABs) under s 267.8 of the Insurance Act.