In Lee v Ponte, 2018 ONCA 1021, the Ontario Court of Appeal considered whether S.7 of the Limitations Act...

This was a dispute between AIG Insurance Company of Canada and Lloyd's Underwriters in respect of the duty to defend a claim brought against the City of Markham.

This good faith obligation was more recently affirmed in the case RBC General Insurance Co. v. Field

The Government of Ontario is striving to make the roads in this province a safer place.

The recent LAT decision in 16-000218 v. Aviva Insurance broadens the definition of the term "accident" as per SABS and potentially opens doors for accident benefits claims being brought forward ...

Hacking is one of the most well-known cyber risks and comes from outside of your organization.

In Ontario (Children's Lawyer for Ontario) v Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner) 2018 ONCA 599, the Court of Appeal for Ontario considered the novel issue of whether a child-client's litigation...

The Ontario Court of Appeal Interprets a "Person Authorized by Law"

On January 30, 2026, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co., 2026 SCC 3. At its core, the case is about contract interpretation, specifically...

What constitutes a valid refusal of an accident benefit on the part of an insurer? FSCO Arbitrator Anne Morris was required to revisit the issue in the hearing of Jody Falcon ats State Farm, with reasons released on February 16, 2016.

On June 28, 2021, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice led by Myers J., released a decision in Arksey v. Sky Zone Toronto, 2021 ONSC 4594.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then a video is worth more than a million.

In Beckford v. Bathia, the Plaintiff sued the Defendant Bathia for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident.

Canadians with any form of online presence are at risk of being the victims of data breaches.

A Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision examines when landlords can be held liable for injuries sustained by their tenants' visitors, establishing that landlords who exercise sufficient control over premises may owe a duty of care as occupiers. The case explores the standard of care required and the circumstances under which a landlord's failure to address safety hazards can result in legal liability.

In the employment law context, contributory negligence may be framed as a consideration of whether or not the terminated employee has mitigated their damages.

This same duty, however, does not attach to social hosts without the existence of some form of a special relationship.

The Superior Court of Justice of Ontario recently released a decision that provided additional comments on the efficacy of waivers and the development of waiver defences in Ontario.

Subrogated claims require a distinct approach from defense cases; not only is the onus on the plaintiff...

Many employers are beginning to implement mandatory vaccination policies in their workplaces. In doing so, they must balance the risks to their businesses and employees of a workplace outbreak of ...