Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

9,027 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Penetrating The Haze, Losing The Mojo

    When two parties own very similar marks used in connection with related goods, the courts are not going accept the likelihood of confusion, even if the parties themselves are willing to risk it.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
    Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • Article

    Personal Jurisdiction Found Where Website Harms

    Addressing issues of personal jurisdiction regarding copyright infringement on the internet, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed a lower courts ruling and found that a Tennessee website operator was subject to jurisdiction for copyright infringement of a Florida residents works. Licciardello v. Lovelady, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21376 (11th Cir., Oct. 10, 2008) (Hill, J.).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    McDermott Will & Emery
    McDermott Will & Emery
Article

Policing Your Registrations is No Joke, COMIC CON Trademark Dispute Shows

The San Diego Comic Convention (SDCC) and the proprietors of Utah's "Salt Lake Comic Con" sparred recently in summary judgment arguments over the SDCC's COMIC CON trademark.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Reed Smith
Reed Smith
  • Article

    PORNO JESUS Mark Refused As Disparaging To Christian-Americans

    In a straightforward application of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, the TTAB upheld a refusal to register the mark PORNO JESUS for adult entertainment videos finding the mark may disparage Christian-Americans.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Practice Pointer: NEVER NEVER Ever Ever Sell Your Name….Unless "They" Pay You A Lot Of Money.

    The fashion industry is blessed with many ultra-talented designers.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lewis Roca
    Lewis Roca
  • Article

    Precedential No. 2: TTAB Again Lets Party Off The Hook Based On January 2017 Rule Changes

    On June 29, 2017, the day its pretrial disclosures were due, Opposer Kid-Systeme filed a motion to reopen its time to file a motion for summary judgment.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Prior Registration Defense Not Available When A Mark Is Challenged As Merely Descriptive

    Can a mark be challenged as merely descriptive when the owner also owns an incontestable registration for the identical mark covering near identical services?
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Protect Your Trademarks In Cuba Now

    With President Obama's December 17, 2014 announcement of the reestablishment of diplomatic relations with Cuba, a number of travel and trade restrictions with Cuba have been lifted, with more expected to follow. Cuba is on its way to becoming a potential area of expansion for U.S. companies.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
  • Article

    Pryor Cashman's Trademark Group Once Again Ranked Top Practice By World Trademark Review

    Pryor Cashman's Trademark Group has been ranked in the 2021 edition of World Trademark Review 1000: The World's Leading Trademark Professionals.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Pryor Cashman LLP
    Pryor Cashman LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Strictly Applies Regulations Governing Requests For Rehearing

    Practitioners facing a denied petition for inter partes review might take comfort in knowing that the AIA permits a request for rehearing.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    PTO Extends Time For Small And Micro Entities To Pay Certain Fees

    Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) extended the time for small and micro entities to make certain fee payments until September 30, 2020.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    McDermott Will & Emery
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article

    PTO Promotes Judicial Independence In Final PTAB Rule

    On June 12, 2024, the USPTO issued a final rule governing the pre-issuance circulation and review of decisions within the PTAB. This formalized current USPTO procedures...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Article

    Recommended Reading: Germain And Sitler, "The Constitution Commandeth: Thou Shalt Not Protect The Same Subject Matter Under Design Patent And Trade Dress Laws"

    Kenneth B. Germain and Louise H Sitler provide some pre-Yuletide reading material with their new article, "The Constitution Commandeth: Thou Shalt Not Protect the Same Subject Matter...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Recommended Reading: NYU Law Professors Beebe And Fromer, "Immoral Or Scandalous Marks: An Empirical Analysis"

    Professors Barton Beebe and Jeanne C. Fromer of New York University School of Law have published a new article on Section 2(a) "immoral or scandalous" refusals:
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Recommended Reading: Prof. Robert A. Mikos, "Unauthorized And Unwise: The Lawful Use Requirement In Trademark Law"

    Professor Robert E. Mikos takes the USPTO to task in his recent Vanderbilt Law Review article, "Unauthorized and Unwise: The Lawful Use Requirement in Trademark Law".
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Recommended Reading: The Trademark Reporter, November-December 2022 Issue

    INTA has published the November-December, 2022 (Vol. 112 No. 6) issue of The Trademark Reporter.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Registering The Name Of A Famous Living Individual Can Protect The Famous Name After The Individual Passes

    The Ms. Teresea H. Earnhardt v. Bobby Dale Earnhardt LLC case is also interesting because it is a great example of how to maintain one's famous name as a trademark after one dies.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lewis Roca
    Lewis Roca
  • Article

    Registration of "foradodge.com" Violates ACPA

    In 1996, defendant Keith Maydak registered the domain name "foradodge.com" along with several other questionable domain names, under the name of the nonexistent entity The Net Inc.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    McDermott Will & Emery
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article

    "Rejection" Of A Trademark License In Bankruptcy Is A Breach, Not A Rescission

    Bankruptcy protection under Section 365 does not give brand owners/debtor-licensors the unilateral right to rescind trademark licensing agreements.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Article

    Reminder: Alert To All Brand Owners Of .xxx Domain Extension

    In anticipation of the upcoming launch of the ICM Registry's new top level domain .xxx, which will roll out this fall, Blank Rome LLP is available to assist owners of registered trademarks
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Blank Rome LLP
    Blank Rome LLP
  • Showing 941–960 of 9027 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics