34,884 results found

In Mobility Workx, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC, the Federal Circuit in a split decision concluded that Mobility Workx, LLC's constitutional challenges to structure and funding of the Patent Trial...

In Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's holding that certain claims of patents owned by Acceleration Bay were unpatentable ...

Intellectual Property special counsel Christine Willgoos and associate Shannon H. Hedvat's article "Federal Circuit Preserves Plaintiff's Choice of Forum in Hatch-Waxman Cases," appeared in the May/June 2016 issue of IP Litigator.

Genentech, Hoffmann-La Roche, and Biogen have settled their BPCIA litigation against Dr. Reddy's Laboratories ("DRL") and Fresenius Kabi.

On October 26, 2018, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, et al. to address whether the U.S. government is a "person" who may petition to institute review proceedings under the AIA.

High Point SARL ("High Point") appealed a grant of summary judgment dismissing its lawsuit on the grounds of equitable estoppel and laches.

Rob Mattson wrote an article entitled "How Foreign Patent Infringers Are Subject to Jurisdiction in the United States" featured in IP Watchdog.

Significant amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure became effective on December 1, 2015 and include an important change to patent infringement pleading practice...

In MCM Portfolio v. Hewlett-Packard, No. 2015-1091 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 2, 2015), the Federal Circuit held that an inter partes review (IPR) does not violate Article III or the Seventh Amendment.

A pilot program proposed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office would have a single Administrative Patent Judge (APJ).

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Celebrate International, LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises, et al., Civil Action No. 14-261-RGA (D.Del., August 28, 2015), the Court issued its Markman opinion...

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., et al. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc., et al. the Court denied the motion to transfer venue...

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson the Court denied defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's complaint alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,826,620...

Judge Sleet Denies Defendants' Post-Trial Proposed Finding of Invalidity of Patents-in-Suit Due To Obviousness

In its Memorandum Order, the Court adopted the plaintiff's proposed construction of the term in dispute.

In Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Hyperlync Technologies, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied, without prejudice, Hyperlync's motion to dismiss on 35 USC § 101 grounds.

On June 9, 2016, Duane Morris attorney Gregory S. Bombard moderated a panel at the Boston Bar Association on "Negotiating and Enforcing Protective Orders in Trade Secret Cases."

Of note, the Staff recommended that the scope of the advisory opinion be limited to the products actually named in the requesters' petition.