1,445 results found

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Blanche v. Lau fundamentally changes how border officers may treat lawful permanent residents with criminal histories when returning from international travel. While not every green-card holder faces immediate concern, those with pending charges, prior convictions, or unresolved criminal matters now face heightened scrutiny that could affect their reentry rights. Understanding the distinction between being treated as a returning resident versus an applicant for admission

The US Department of State (DOS) has authority to revoke the visa stamp of individuals who have been charged with Driving While Intoxicated (DUI) or related charges.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Blanche v. Lau fundamentally changes how lawful permanent residents with criminal histories are treated at the border. What does this mean for green card holders returning from international travel, and how should employers protect their workforce from unexpected immigration consequences?

Insurers must be ready to meet the challenge.

Colorado has enlisted the help of the criminal justice system to reinforce its strong public policy against restrictive covenants.

Canada’s new Combating Counterfeit Products Act officially took effect on January 1, 2015.

On February 28, 2008, Hanjuan Jin, a Chinese-born former software engineer for Motorola, arrived at Chicago O’Hare Airport en route to Beijing.

On September 20, 2021, actor Rovier Carrington was arrested for allegedly faking salacious emails used to target two Viacom executives in a $50 million suit alleging sexual abuse and misconduct.

In Maynard v. Snapchat, Inc., Case No. A18A0749 (decided June 5, 2018), the Georgia Court of Appeals addressed a tragic situation involving an automobile accident and the popular application Snapchat.

This time, we're reviewing the Court's docket data on the criminal (quasi-criminal, juvenile justice and mental health) side of the docket, calculating the percentage of cases year-by-year that arose from final judgments.

This time, we're comparing the lag time from grant to decision in criminal cases to the ultimate case result.

Sportscaster Erin Andrew's suit against a Nashville Marriott and the stalker who the hotel let check-in to a room next to her has made national headlines

Appellants' and appellees' amici had similar won-lost records overall in criminal cases from 2010 to 2020 – appellants won two-thirds of the time, and appellees' amici won 69.23% of their cases.

One bit of conventional wisdom that's frequently heard about appellate review in California is that if a Court of Appeal opinion isn't published

Our data contains 128 affirmances and 136 reversals between 2010 and 2016.

The plaintiff, Jody Goldstein, was beaten and robbed, resulting in serious, permanent injuries while staying as a guest at the Chateau Orleans, a combination hotel, timeshare...

Judge Leslie Ann Celebrezze asked the trial court to hide from public view subpoena language quoting a sexual text message she allegedly sent.

The past several years have seen a slew of high-profile excessive force cases against law enforcement officers, often highlighted by cell phone video.