209 results found

In Kuvera Resources Pte Ltd v JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. [2023] SGCA 28, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that a confirming bank was not entitled to deny payment to the beneficiary...

In Lau Sheng Jan Alistair v Lau Cheok Joo Richard and Sng Gek Hong Cynthia [2023] SGHC 196, the applicant, the sole beneficiary of an irrevocable trust created by his parents over landed property, ...

In CHL Construction Pte Ltd v Yangguang Group Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC 62, the Singapore High Court ("SGHC") considered whether, with respect to SOPA claims, contractual provisions relating to SOPA timelines survive...

The Singapore chapter touched on issues such as an overview of the dispute resolution framework, the year in review, court procedures, legal practice documents and the protection of privilege and alternative to litigation such as arbitration, mediation and other forms of dispute resolution.

In Newton, David Christopher v Public Prosecutor [2023] SGHC 266, a case involving the appellant's attempt to deceive the health authorities that he was vaccinated against COVID-19 when in fact he was not, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore (High Court).

It is now well-established that a failure to file a payment response prevents a respondent from raising any objections, including jurisdictional ones, during both the adjudication and setting aside applications, save for arguments on patent errors.

Authored Publication – While international business offers new opportunities, they are often accompanied by challenges of their own. In the event of disputes, parties may need to enforce court judgments in a foreign jurisdiction, an often daunting prospect.

In an increasingly interconnected and borderless world, Mareva injunctions in support of foreign court proceedings can play an important role in preserving assets which the defendant might otherwise dissipate for the purpose of avoiding satisfaction of the foreign judgment.

Can a prior AD still be enforced if it had effectively been superseded by a subsequent AD which took into account the prior AD? This was the question raised before the SGHC in United Integrated Services Pte Ltd v Civil Tech Pte Ltd and another [2019] SGHC 32.

In this case, the High Court gives useful guidance on when individuals may be found to be "de facto" directors.

Recently, veteran athletics coach Loh Siang Piow was acquitted of two charges of outraging the modesty of an athlete.

Carey Olsen has added to its Singapore litigation, insolvency and restructuring practice with the recruitment of associate Amelia Tan.

The following is based on the case of Redsun Singapore Pte Ltd v Tsung-Tse Hsieh [2015] SGIPOS 1.

Amendments to the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161), in April of this year, make it slightly easier for foreign senior counsel to appear in the Singapore courts on an ad hoc basis.

A recent decision of the Singapore High Court has clarified the circumstances in which it will order a stay of arbitral proceedings pending a challenge to the tribunal's jurisdiction.

The winding-up process in Singapore is no longer available in respect of debt claims that are subject to a valid arbitration clause, except in extremely limited circumstances.

シンガポールを仲裁地とする仲裁において、仲裁廷は管轄の有無について自ら判断する権限を有しています.