The Unified Patent Court's Court of Appeal in Luxembourg addresses critical questions about patent claim interpretation, indirect infringement liability, and the assessment of non-technical features in inventive step analysis. This landmark decision examines whether software apps distributed through app stores can constitute indirect infringement and establishes important precedents for timeline graph interpretation in patent claims.

Le Grand-Duché du Luxembourg vient de se doter d’un nouvel instrument procédural en matière pénale, afin de désengorger les tribunaux et rendre une justice plus rapide et plus efficace : le « jugement sur accord ».

Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.

The UCITS has the status of Article 16C of the law on the assessment of income tax

Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by the Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.

Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.

Two preliminary sale agreements were signed with the same buyer. The first preliminary sale agreement signed with the seller contained several conditions precedent.

Art. 81(1) UPCA offers the possibility to request a rehearing after a final decision when, it is based on an act which has been held to constitute a criminal...

The Luxembourg Parliament voted on 23 March 2023 to reform and modernise Luxembourg arbitration law through changes to the New Code of Civil Procedure.

Article 109 of the Luxembourg Commercial Code states that an accepted invoice can prove the existence of a sales contract.

This decision relates to an appeal regarding a decision on provisional measures and, in particular, answers the question whether submissions from the main proceedings (and related counterclaim for revocation) are to be considered during the appeal stage of provisional measures.

The Court of Appeal in Luxembourg addresses a critical application for suspensive effect in ongoing appeal proceedings between medical technology companies. This case involves patent EP 2 352 431 and raises important questions about procedural rights under the Unified Patent Court Agreement and the European Convention on Human Rights.

In February 2017, the well-known football club Associazione Calcio Milan SpA filed an application to register its emblem as an international trademark designating the EU for many goods including goods in Class 16 ...

Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.

Im April 2025 trat das Gesetz zur Stärkung des Justizstandorts Deutschland durch die Einführung von Commercial Courts und der Gerichtssprache Englisch in der Zivilgerichtsbarkeit (Justizstandort-Stärkungsgesetz) in Kraft.

The bill n°7945 aiming at implementing into national law Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection...

Domestic tax controversy, encompassing both (i) objections against assessments or hierarchical appeals against other individual decisions and (ii) subsequent appeals...

Clara Mara-Marhuenda François Kremer Philippe Schmit Christian Point Thierry Lesage Ari Gudmannsson Eric Fort Philippe-Emmanuel Partsch Paschalis Paschalidis Jean-Luc Putz...

In our previous trend report, we identified the trend of climate change litigation is shifting from targeting states to also targeting companies.

On 23 March 2023, the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies unanimously approved the new Luxembourg arbitration law, subsequently published in the Memorial on 19 April 2023...