Applicable rule for the withdrawal of an appeal: R. 265 RoP, which has a broad scope

Applicable rule for the withdrawal of an appeal: R. 265 RoP, which has a broad scope

Under Rule 363.2 of the Rules of Procedure, orders given pursuant to Rules 360, 361 and 362 of the Rules of Procedure are final decisions...

As of 1 October 2024, following a recent amendment to Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the EU, preliminary reference procedures in specific areas are transferred from the Court...

As of 1 July 2025, the Hague Convention of 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (the "2019 Hague Convention") entered into force for the UK.

Luxembourg's law of 5 August 2005 on financial collateral arrangements, as amended (Collateral Law 2005), continues to offer strong safe-harbor protections for financial collateral arrangements and is now confirmed to shield from insolvency proceedings globally.

Commercial link (Art. 33(1)(b) UPCA) requires relations between defendants regarding commercial activities for the alleged infringing product or range.

Failure to lodge Statement of response within the time limit of R. 235.2 RoP

Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by the Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.

Article 33(1), third paragraph UPCA, establishes alternative, not exceptional, competence for the Central Division regarding defendants outside Contracting Member States.

An order to preserve evidence pursuant to Art. 60 UPCA also allows for the seizure of promotional and commercial documents (potentially) proving infringing activities and is not limited to documents concerning the technical details of the product or process in question.

Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts

An appeal against a decision of the judge rapporteur can be admissible if it is the subject of the appeal whether the judge rapporteur was entitled to issue the decision under appeal.

En date du 2 décembre 2021, la Chambre des Députés a procédé au vote du projet de loi N°7785 portant modification du Code de procédure pénale.

The primary legal issue revolves around the suspensive effect of an appeal, specifically under Rule 223.4 RoP, which allows for suspensive effect in cases of extreme urgency.

The Unified Patent Court's Court of Appeal examines multiple appeals stemming from infringement and revocation proceedings between Fujifilm Corporation and Kodak entities concerning European Patent EP 3 476 616. The case involves complex jurisdictional questions under the UPC Agreement and raises fundamental issues about patent validity and enforcement across Germany and the United Kingdom.

The Luxembourg government proposes to reform certain aspects of the tax assessment and tax litigation procedures

On 29 July 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered an important judgment on the legal professional privilege. The judgment follows preliminary questions referred to the CJEU...

To conclude our series on Intellectual Property (IP) topics in the MENAP region, our three authors, Jan Wrede (Dubai), Shaukat Ali (Lahore) and Yasir Masood (Dubai), held an open panel discussion...

Luxembourg is a civil law country and has a codified legal system largely based on the French codes. The rules governing civil procedure are laid down in the New Code of Civil Procedure ...