The European Parliament calls for greater transparency and regulation of third-party litigation funding (TPLF) in the EU.

Just as customer experience has become a crucial part of every company's success, citizen experience is climbing the public sector's priority ladder

The Grand-Ducal regulation of 22 January 2021, published in the Mémorial A n° 76 de 2021, declared the new agreement on the legal regime of teleworking signed on 20 October 2020 between...

Jackye Elombo and Florence Piret have contributed the Luxembourg chapter of the 3rd edition of Global Legal Insights - Litigation & Dispute Resolution handbook.

Until recently, class actions existed only in a handful of EU Member States. However, they will become an EU-wide phenomenon soon as a result of the Representative Actions EU Directive ("RAD")...

Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.

In the absence of a specific fee for a specific case, such a fee is to be charged for the case that is most comparable to the present case according...

Applicant failed to demonstrate that a review of the impugned order is necessary to ensure a consistent application and interpretation of the RoP (point 8 of the Preamble of the RoP) or any other objective...

The Court of appeal's decision brings a final answer to the debate. While the Luxembourg courts have clarified on numerous occasions the modalities surrounding the 1958 New York Convention...

Bill of law 7650 introducing class actions in consumer law was unanimously adopted by the Luxembourg Parliament on Thursday, 30 October 2025.

The administrative court is competent to hear the appeal to annul the decision of a pre-empting authority to exercise its right of pre-emption.

The Law of 14 September 2018 on a transparent and open administration ("the Law"), gives any person the right to obtain access to a document held by the administration...

On 27 February 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered a judgment on the conditions for the validity of an asymmetric jurisdiction clause in the context of the Brussels Ibis Regulation.

Regulation (EU) 2018/302 on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination ("Geo-blocking Regulation"), applicable as from 3 December 2018, sets out rules

If the appellant takes full advantage of the 15-day deadline for lodging the Statement of appeal and the Statement of grounds of appeal pursuant...

A request to expedite appeal proceedings, namely a request to shorten any deadlines where possible pursuant to R. 225(e), R.9.3 RoP,

Le 16 septembre 2021 est entrée en vigueur la loi du 15 juillet 2021 portant modification du Nouveau Code de Procédure Civile (NCPC).

The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court examines the stringent requirements for granting suspensive effect under Article 74(1) UPCA and Rule 223.2 RoP in patent litigation. This decision clarifies when an applicant's interest in maintaining the status quo during an appeal can exceptionally outweigh the respondent's interests in cost proceedings related to revocation actions.

This is in accordance with the principles of procedural economy and cost efficiency as well as a fair balance between the legitimate interests of the parties...

This verdict validates a garnishment order which does not target the debtors themselves but which applies