If in order to "judge the pudding, you have to try it" as they say in the well-known English proverb, then for justice in various cases (criminal, civil, economic, etc.)...

On February 27, 2017, Law No. 49-VI on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan in Relation to Issues of Improvement of the Civil Law, Banking Law...

On 17 December 2025, President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev signed amendments aimed at expanding the scope of administrative justice, which will enter into force on 29 December 2025.

Unfortunately, this process may sometimes be accompanied by instances of frivolous or vexatious litigations.

The new Civil Procedure Code envisages different procedures for consideration of investment disputes depending on the investor's category.

On December 17, 2025, Law No. 241-VIII was adopted, introducing amendments to the Administrative Procedure Code (APC), the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), and the Code on Administrative Offenses.

On 17 November 2014 significant modifications were introduced into the Republic of Kazakhstan Code of Civil Procedure.

Kazakhstan's Civil Procedure Code provides an exceptional mechanism for reviewing final court decisions based on newly discovered or new circumstances, but this procedural tool is strictly limited and cannot be used as a substitute for ordinary appeals. Understanding when and how this mechanism applies is critical for parties seeking to challenge binding court acts after exhausting standard appeal options.

Заключая сделки с контрагентами из Казахстана, важно понимать, как работает судебl

The entry into force of the Administrative Procedural and Process-Related Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (APC) marked one of the most significant legal reforms of the past decade.

Kazakhstan is a unitary state, and every piece of legislation adopted by relevant bodies of the state applies within its entire territory.

Если для того, чтобы "судить о пудинге, надо его попробовать" как говориться в известн

Kazakhstan's enforcement regime for foreign arbitral awards presents unique procedural challenges that can derail even well-founded claims. This comprehensive analysis examines the interplay between the New York Convention and local procedural law, revealing critical distinctions between arbitral awards and state court decisions that Kazakhstani judges frequently conflate. Drawing from recent Supreme Court clarifications and documented judicial practice, the review identifies systematic errors in notificati

17 декабря 2025 года принят Закон № 241-VIII, вносящий изменения в Административный процедурно-пр&

Наш департамент представлял Клиента, одну из крупнейших строительных...

Kazakhstan's Supreme Court has issued new normative resolution clarifying critical procedural requirements for administrative litigation, including pre-trial dispute resolution procedures, statute of limitations calculations, and jurisdiction determination criteria. These guidelines address longstanding ambiguities that previously led to inconsistent case returns and procedural barriers, particularly affecting tax disputes and challenges to administrative acts.

Kazakhstan's Supreme Court has issued new normative guidance clarifying critical aspects of administrative jurisdiction and the definition of administrative acts in tax disputes.

This comprehensive legal analysis examines Kazakhstan's Supreme Court Normative Resolution No. 2, which systematically clarifies procedural requirements for administrative litigation. The resolution addresses critical issues including lawsuit admissibility criteria, pre-trial dispute resolution procedures, jurisdictional determinations, and the boundaries of judicial review when assessing the legality of administrative acts and discretionary governmental decisions.