Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 FEBRUARY 2026

Девять Ключевых Изменений В АППК

KP Disputes
Explore more from KP Disputes

17 декабря 2025 года принят Закон № 241-VIII, вносящий изменения в Административный процедурно-пр&

KazakhstanLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Ravil Kassilgov
Ravil Kassilgov
Aibek Kambaliev
Aibek Kambaliev
Bekzada Issabekov
Bekzada Issabekov
Author LinkedIn connections

17 декабря 2025 года принят Закон № 241-VIII, вносящий изменения в Административный процедурно-процессуальный кодекс (АППК), Гражданский процессуальный кодекс (ГПК) и Кодекс об административных правонарушениях. Изменения введены в действие с 29 декабря 2025 года.

1.Оспаривание подзаконных актов в АППК

Дела об оспаривании подзаконных нормативных правовых актов (НПА) перенесены из ГПК в АППК.

  • Новый вид иска: оспаривание законности подзаконных НПА или их отдельных положений (ст. 135-1 АППК).
  • Сроки подачи иска: в течение трех месяцев со дня, когда истцу стало известно о нарушении или возможном нарушении данным актом его прав (ч. 3-1 ст. 136 АППК).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards In Kazakhstan: A Practical Overview Of The Legal Framework

Kazakhstan's enforcement regime for foreign arbitral awards presents unique procedural challenges that can derail even well-founded claims. This comprehensive analysis examines the interplay between the New York Convention and local procedural law, revealing critical distinctions between arbitral awards and state court decisions that Kazakhstani judges frequently conflate. Drawing from recent Supreme Court clarifications and documented judicial practice, the review identifies systematic errors in notificati
KazakhstanLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Unicase Law Firm
Unicase Law Firm
Article

Kazakhstan’s Recent Arbitration Enforcement Precedent: A Loophole Allowing Debtors To Hide Assets?

Since gaining independence in 1991 and following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Kazakhstan has consistently looked outward foreign investors and strengthen its economy. The oil and gas sector remains one of the most attractive areas for many investors, especially for the major players from Europe and the United States. Although the economy has grown rapidly since 1991, Kazakhstan continues to pursue an investor- friendly course, as there are still many areas as agriculture, technology, financial services and others to be improved with the involvement of foreign investments.
KazakhstanLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
GRATA International
GRATA International
Article

Revisiting Final Decisions: Where New Circumstances End And Legal Certainty Begins

Kazakhstan's Civil Procedure Code provides an exceptional mechanism for reviewing final court decisions based on newly discovered or new circumstances, but this procedural tool is strictly limited and cannot be used as a substitute for ordinary appeals. Understanding when and how this mechanism applies is critical for parties seeking to challenge binding court acts after exhausting standard appeal options.
KazakhstanLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Unicase Law Firm
Unicase Law Firm