2,093 results found

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry has released Press Note No. 3 (2016 series) dated 29th March, 2016 wherein it has released guidelines for Foreign Direct Investment on E-commerce.

The Bombay High Court ("BHC") has in the judgement dated February 28, 2022 ("Judgement"), in the matter of Pigments and Allieds v. Carboline

Sometimes, as legal practitioners, our work extends far beyond the technicalities of claims, compensation and allegations.

Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) governs arbitrator's power to award interest. Section 31(7)(a) covers pre-award/pendente lite interest (subject to party agreement), while section 31(7)(b) covers post-award interest. Courts have consistently held that these provisions operate separately, with arbitrator having absolute discretion while awarding future interest however, bound by parties’ agreement (if any) with respect to pre- award period.

Blacklisting by the state and its instrumentalities has long been recognized as an administrative measure carrying severe civil consequences.

The Supreme Court in its recent judgement of 'Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. CG Power and Industrial Solutions Ltd. & Anr.

The Delhi High Court ("High Court"), in Intec Capital Limited v. Mr. Shekhar Chand Jain, ARB. A. (COMM.) 25/2024 by its order dated September 4, 2025...

In a judgment dated 2nd September 2024 in Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. v. Mrs. Saroj Tandon1, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court ("High Court") dealt with an important procedural question...

In The High Court of Delhi M/s JSW Ispat Steel Limited (Now known As JSW Steel Limited) [Appellant] Vs. M/s Gas Authority of India Limited [Respondents

In ONGC Ltd v. JSIW Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. [2025:DHC:430-DB], the Delhi High Court examined whether an arbitral award dismissing a contractor's claim for excise duty reimbursement could be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

This Playbook presents a curated selection of recent rulings that have significantly shaped the arbitration ecosystem in India, spanning the full arbitration lifecycle from contract formation and tribunal constitution to interim measures, and post-award challenges.

The judgement came through a Five-Judges Bench in Cox and Kings Ltd. v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd.

The Ordinance, which comes into effect immediately, is a step towards swift disposal of commercial disputes of a specified value.

In National Highways Authority of India v. M/s Hindustan Construction Company Limited, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India fine-tuned the limits of judicial intervention in challenge proceedings initiated against an arbitral award.

An arbitral award may be set aside by a court in India if it is found to be in conflict with the public policy of India. Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act), an award is considered to be in conflict...

The Court underscored the difference between ‘incorporation of' and mere ‘reference to' clauses of one contract in the context of another contract.

Notwithstanding the complications involved, the Delhi High Court went ahead and passed an order refraining the Defendants from pursuing arbitral proceedings under the LCIA, in London.