Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

2,877 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Geographical Indications Of Goods (Registration And Protection) (Amendment) Rules, 2020- Notified

    The Ministry of Commerce and Industry (Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade) vide notification G.S.R. 528(E) dated 26th August, 2020 have amended the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules, 2002.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S.S. Rana & Co.
    S.S. Rana & Co.
  • Article

    Going ‘Zen'

    The practice of trade marks getting the status of a ‘well-known mark' has gained momentum with several renowned companies competing for the coveted status.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    R. K. Dewan & Co
    R. K. Dewan & Co
Article

H&M Wins Injunction Based On Prior Adoption Abroad

In H&M; Hennes & Mauritz Ab & Anr v. HM Megabrands Pvt. Ltd. & Ors/ IA-7259/2016 (May 31, 2018), the High Court of Delhi, issued a permanent injunction against the defendants HM Megabrands Pvt. Ltd & Ors., ...
IndiaIntellectual Property
R. K. Dewan & Co
R. K. Dewan & Co
  • Article

    Importance Of IPR In Today's World

    IPR is a significant tool in today's era. The risk of an innovation getting infringed without the knowledge of the inventor stands very high.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S&A Law Offices
    S&A Law Offices
  • Article

    Important Notice: "NICE" - Amendment to Classification of Goods and Services in India

    The Trade Marks Rules, 2002 was recently amended to incorporate additional service class headings. India has added 3 more classes of services to the classification of services for the reason of registration of service marks.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Vaish Associates Advocates
    Vaish Associates Advocates
  • Article

    Infringement Of Trademarks On E-Commerce Platforms | Forum For Territorial Jurisdiction

    Whether sale of infringing goods on third party e-commerce platforms accessible within the forum state satisfies the territorial jurisdiction of that forum/Court?
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Mansukhlal Hiralal & Company
    Mansukhlal Hiralal & Company
  • Article

    Is Abolishment Of IP Appellate Board A Right Decision By Government?

    IPAB which was authorized to hear appeals against the decisions of the Registrar in matters related to Trademarks, Patents, Copyright, Geographical Indications, and Plant Varieties has been abolished ...
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S&A Law Offices
    S&A Law Offices
  • Article

    L&T Wins Suit Against Infringers

    In the recent case of Larsen & Toubro Ltd & another v/s Radheshyam Singh & another, a District Court in New Delhi restrained the defendant from using the marks which were deceptively similar to...
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Lack Of Jurisdiction: Shaw Wallace´ Plaint Returned

    Jurisdiction is undoubtedly the most important consideration while filling a suit. Being, a subject incorporated in the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 the issue presented itself forth the Delhi High Court in the case of "Shaw Wallace v. M.P. Beer Products" [2009 (39) PTC 129].
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Legal Victory: Dabur Secures Injunction For Honitus Cough Remedies Against Goodluck Ayurveda Pvt Ltd

    In the ever-evolving landscape of intellectual property rights and trademark infringements, a recent legal battle has caught the attention of the legal community and the corporate world alike.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
    Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
  • Article

    Maruti Udyog Wins Trademark Battle Against Maruti Piston Before IPAB

    Indian Automobile giant Maruti Udyog Limited has won a legal battle against a piston producing company from the Indian state of Gujarat, i.e., Maruti Piston Private Limited which sought to claim trademark rights over the mark ‘Maruti'.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S.S. Rana & Co.
    S.S. Rana & Co.
  • Article

    Mask Up! An Initiative By Nestle

    With the ongoing speculations of the possible outbreak of a third wave of COVID 19, ‘MASK UP!' an initiative by Nestle, is a step forward towards spreading greater awareness about the importance of wearing a mask.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S.S. Rana & Co.
    S.S. Rana & Co.
  • Article

    Mediation And Conciliation Process Initiated For Contested Matters In TMR, Delhi

    As per the said Public Notice, it has been decided initially to undertake the project on pilot basis by taking up 500 pending Opposition and Rectification matters.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S.S. Rana & Co.
    S.S. Rana & Co.
  • Article

    Mega Clash: Hennes & Mauritz Ab & Anr V. HM Megabrands Pvt. Ltd.

    In H&M; Hennes & Mauritz Ab & Anr v. HM Megabrands Pvt. Ltd. & Ors/ IA-7259/2016 (May 31, 2018), the High Court of Delhi, issued a permanent injunction ...
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    R. K. Dewan & Co
    R. K. Dewan & Co
  • Article

    Navigating Trademark Protection In The Digital Age: The Titan vs. Lenskart Case

    The Delhi High Court delivered a noteworthy judgment on May 30, 2025, in the case of Titan vs. Lenskart Solutions Pvt. Ltd., addressing crucial issues of trademark infringement...
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    IndiaLaw LLP
    IndiaLaw LLP
  • Article

    NEURALINK: Linking Present To Future

    It's not every day, we hear stories of young kids dreaming about building computers and becoming entrepreneurs.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Photon legal
    Photon legal
  • Article

    No Relief For Toyota From Supreme Court In The Prius Matter. Decision May Have Implications On The Provisions Of Well-Known Mark.

    The Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) has affirmed the order of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (Division Bench) permitting the use of the mark PRIUS by Prius Auto.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Khaitan & Co.
    Khaitan & Co.
  • Article

    Orders Passed By Trade Mark Associate Managers To Be Revalidated

    Recently in the case of Visa International Ltd. v Visa International Service Association & Anr and Garden Silk Mills Private Limited v Rajesh Mallick & Ors., a Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court held that associate managers of the Trade Marks Registry ...
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Khaitan & Co.
    Khaitan & Co.
  • Article

    Passing Off In Design

    Design is considered a statutory right whereas passing off and trade mark are considered as sui generis right. A statutory right entails its origin and extinguishment happens in terms of the statue.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Litmus Legal
    Litmus Legal
  • Article

    Past Actions Indicate Likelihood Of Future Infringement

    In a recent case before the Bombay High Court, although there appeared to be no infringing sale taking place at the time of the matter being decided.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Obhan Mason
    Obhan Mason
  • Showing 521–540 of 2877 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics